I am going to quote Lee Jones who has been doing some snprintf ->
scnprintf refactorings:

"There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that
{v}snprintf() returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the
destination array.  However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf()
really returns the length of the data that *would have been* written if
there were enough space for it.  This misunderstanding has led to
buffer-overruns in the past.  It's generally considered safer to use the
{v}scnprintf() variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple
cases).  So let's do that."

To help prevent new instances of snprintf() from popping up, let's add a
check to checkpatch.pl.

Suggested-by: Finn Thain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v5:
- use capture groups to let the user know which variation they used
- Link to v4: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v4:
- also check for vsnprintf variant (thanks Bill)
- Link to v3: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v3:
- fix indentation
- add reference link (https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105) (thanks Joe)
- Link to v2: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v2:
- Had a vim moment and deleted a character before sending the patch.
- Replaced the character :)
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
>From a discussion here [1].

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 9c4c4a61bc83..b7404e53c554 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7012,6 +7012,12 @@ sub process {
                             "Prefer strscpy, strscpy_pad, or __nonstring over 
strncpy - see: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90\n"; . $herecurr);
                }
 
+# {v}snprintf uses that should likely be {v}scnprintf
+               if ($line =~ /\b((v|)snprintf\s*\()/) {
+                       WARN("SNPRINTF",
+                            "Prefer ${2}scnprintf over $1 - see: 
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105\n"; . $herecurr);
+               }
+
 # ethtool_sprintf uses that should likely be ethtool_puts
                if ($line =~ 
/\bethtool_sprintf\s*\(\s*$FuncArg\s*,\s*$FuncArg\s*\)/) {
                        if (WARN("PREFER_ETHTOOL_PUTS",

---
base-commit: b401b621758e46812da61fa58a67c3fd8d91de0d
change-id: 20240221-snprintf-checkpatch-a864ed67ebd0

Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <[email protected]>


Reply via email to