On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:01:58PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 5:03 PM Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > local_irq_disable(); > > The above local_irq_disable() is not new for my patch but it seems > wonky for two reasons: > > 1. It feels like it should have been the first thing in the function. > > 2. It feels like it should be local_daif_mask() instead.
Is that to ensure we don't take a pNMI? I think that makes sense, but let's please add a comment to say why local_irq_disable() is not sufficient. Will
