On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 08:45:28AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 02:50:02PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > This is like container_of() but it has an assert to ensure that it's > > using the first struct member. > > > > I just remembered that Greg wanted this based on container_of_const().
Yes, that would be best. > Really container_of_const() should be renamed to container_of() and > container_of() should be renamed to container_of_helper() and we > would add a #define container_of_const container_of for the transition. I agree, but I wonder if it's safe to just do that already and how many build warnings would happen. Last I checked it was a lot. thanks, greg k-h
