Hi Lorenzo and Muhammad

Reviving this thread since the merging window is closed and we have
more time to review /work on this code in the next few weeks.

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 3:50 PM Jeff Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Lorenzo
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 12:28 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I also suggest we figure out this FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE() thing at this point
> > too - I may be missing something, but I cannot for the life me understand
> > why we have to assert negations only, and other self tests do not do this.
> >
> My most test-infra related comments comes from Muhammad Usama Anjum
> (added into this email), e.g. assert is not recommended.[1] ,
>
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
Specifically regarding Lorenzo's comments about FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE

Muhammad Usama Anjum doesn't want assert being used in selftest (see
[1] above), and I quote:
"We don't want to terminate the test if one test fails because of assert. We
want the sub-tests to get executed in-dependent of other tests.

ksft_test_result(condition, fmt, ...);
ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ...);"

FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE is a wrapper for ksft_test_result macro, and
replacement of assert.

Please let me know if you have questions on this and Muhammad might
also help to clarify the requirement if needed.

Thanks
-Jeff

Reply via email to