On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 14:36 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, I was actually going to mention this commit, as it's the one that > > > introduced > > > that `bool radar_detected` to the flex struct. However, it wasn't obvious > > > to me > > > how `struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf conf` could overwrite `radar_detected` > > > as I didn't > > > see `conf->drv_priv` being accessed through `struct struct > > > ieee80211_chanctx_conf`. > > > > You have to look at the drivers, see hwsim_clear_chanctx_magic() for > > example; I wonder why hwsim_check_chanctx_magic() never caught this. > > Sorry, I actually meant through `struct ieee80211_chanctx`. Something like: > > struct ieee80211_chanctx *foo; > ... > > foo->conf.drv_priv[i] = something; > > or > > struct bar *ptr = (void *)foo->conf->drv_priv; > then write something into *ptr... > > In the above cases the code will indeed overwrite `radar_detected`.
Right, that's what it does though, no? Except it doesn't have, in the driver, "foo->conf." because mac80211 only gives it a pointer to conf, so it's only "conf->drv_priv" (and it's the "struct bar" example.) So yeah, pretty sure it will overwrite that, and I do wonder why it wasn't caught. I guess no radar detection tests with MLO yet. johannes
