On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 5:25 PM Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 2:59 PM Thorsten Blum <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > In addition to str_on_off() and str_yes_no(), add rules to search for > > > str_off_on() and str_no_yes() replacements. > > > > I don't know cocci well enough, but this does simply not scale. We > > also have cases where "Yes"/"No", "YES"/"NO" and all possible > > variations of that. > > Andy, are you concerned about the number of such functions in the kernel > or the number of rules in the semantic patch.
Rules for the semantic patches I am worried about. > There are indeed more > concise ways to write the semantic patch. Would be nice to see ways to cover more cases in less lines in the spatch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
