…
> We are trying to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions to prevent integer overflows[1]. …

Is an imperative wording more desirable for such a change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc3#n94


…
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c | 2 +-
…

How do you think about to improve your version management?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22This+looks+like+a+new+version+of+a+previously+submitted+patch%22
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc3#n780


…
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c
> @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ void thermal_debug_tz_add(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>
>       tz_dbg->tz = tz;
>
> -     tz_dbg->trips_crossed = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * tz->num_trips, 
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +     tz_dbg->trips_crossed = kcalloc(tz->num_trips, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
…

See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.14-rc3#n941

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to