On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 06:21:40PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Use devlink_alloc() to alloc zl3073x_dev structure, register the device
> as a devlink device and add devlink callback to provide devlink device
> info.

...

>  /**
>   * zl3073x_devm_alloc - allocates zl3073x device structure
>   * @dev: pointer to device structure
> @@ -124,12 +204,18 @@ static const struct regmap_config zl3073x_regmap_config 
> = {
>  struct zl3073x_dev *zl3073x_devm_alloc(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       struct zl3073x_dev *zldev;
> +     struct devlink *devlink;
>       int rc;
>  
> -     zldev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*zldev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!zldev)
> +     devlink = devlink_alloc(&zl3073x_devlink_ops, sizeof(*zldev), dev);
> +     if (!devlink)
>               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> +     /* Add devres action to free devlink device */
> +     if (devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zl3073x_devlink_free, devlink))
> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

Please, do not shadow the error codes. You might miss something. Shadowing
error codes needs a good justification.

> +     zldev = devlink_priv(devlink);
>       zldev->dev = dev;

>  }

...

> +     /* Add devres action to unregister devlink device */
> +     rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(zldev->dev, zl3073x_devlink_unregister,
> +                                   devlink);
> +     if (rc)
> +             return rc;

The code is even inconsistent in one patch!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Reply via email to