On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 11:01:34AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>
> > 2025年4月19日 11:55，Coly Li <i...@coly.li> 写道：
> >
> >
> >
> >> 2025年4月19日 04:21，Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> 写道：
> >>
> >> GCC 15's new -Wunterminated-string-initialization notices that the 16
> >> character lookup table "zero_uuid" (which is not used as a C-String)
> >> needs to be marked as "nonstring":
> >>
> >> drivers/md/bcache/super.c: In function 'uuid_find_empty':
> >> drivers/md/bcache/super.c:549:43: warning: initializer-string for array of
> >> 'char' truncates NUL terminator but destination lacks 'nonstring'
> >> attribute (17 chars into 16 available)
> >> [-Wunterminated-string-initialization]
> >> 549 | static const char zero_uuid[16] =
> >> "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0";
> >> |
> >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Add the annotation (since it is not used as a C-String), and switch the
> >> initializer to an array of bytes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >> v2: use byte array initializer (colyli)
> >> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250416220135.work.394-k...@kernel.org/
> >> Cc: Coly Li <col...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstr...@linux.dev>
> >> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: linux-bca...@vger.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> >> index e42f1400cea9..a76ce92502ed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> >> @@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ static struct uuid_entry *uuid_find(struct cache_set
> >> *c, const char *uuid)
> >>
> >> static struct uuid_entry *uuid_find_empty(struct cache_set *c)
> >> {
> >> - static const char zero_uuid[16] = "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0";
> >> + static const char zero_uuid[] __nonstring =
> >
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> > I notice zero_uuid[16] changes to zero_uuid[], then the element number
> > information is removed.
> >
> > Is it OK for GCC 15 to only add __nonstring and keep zero_uuid[16]?
Either way is fine. I can update the patch to use the "[16]" again if
you'd like?
-Kees
> Ping ?
>
> You are expert here, I need your opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Coly Li
>
>
>
> >> + { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> >>
> >> return uuid_find(c, zero_uuid);
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
>
>
--
Kees Cook
