On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 11:06:06PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > I stand by my "let's not add random letters to existing functions that > > are already too confusing".
If the name is your main concern, we can discuss a more explicit name in the kernel. I still plan to propose it as seprintf() for standardization, and for libc, but if that reads as a letter soup to you, I guess we can call it sprintf_end() or whatever, for the kernel. Does that sound reasonable enough? What do you think about the diff itself ignoring the function name? Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
