On 9/1/25 9:45 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:39:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Are you (implicitly?) saying that all previous attempts at transitional >> kconfig symbols have failed? If so, I just wasn't aware of that. > > I haven't found any way to do a "proper" CONFIG transition. I looked > through past transitions and they all left stuff visible. Is there a way > to actually do this with existing kconfig? > I don't know. I haven't looked as hard at it as you have. I just didn't realize that there had been significant failures that required kconfig code changes. I'm just trying to understand. Carry on. -- ~Randy
