On Fri, 5 Sept 2025 at 07:28, Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > After commit cbc654d18d37 ("bitops: Add __attribute_const__ to generic > ffs()-family implementations"), which allows GCC's value range tracker > to see past ffs(), GCC 8 on ARM thinks that it might be possible that > "ffs(rq) - 8" used here: > > v = FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ, ffs(rq) - 8); > > could wrap below 0, leading to a very large value, which would be out of > range for the FIELD_PREP() usage: > > drivers/pci/pci.c: In function 'pcie_set_readrq': > include/linux/compiler_types.h:572:38: error: call to > '__compiletime_assert_471' declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: value > too large for the field > ... > drivers/pci/pci.c:5896:6: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_PREP' > v = FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ, ffs(rq) - 8); > ^~~~~~~~~~ > > If the result of the ffs() is bounds checked before being used in > FIELD_PREP(), the value tracker seems happy again. :) > > Fixes: cbc654d18d37 ("bitops: Add __attribute_const__ to generic ffs()-family > implementations") > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <l...@linaro.org> > Closes: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CA+G9fYuysVr6qT8bjF6f08WLyCJRG7aXAeSd2F7=ztahhd7...@mail.gmail.com/ > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> > --- > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> > Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.rox...@linaro.org> > Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org> > Cc: lkft-tri...@lists.linaro.org > Cc: Linux Regressions <regressi...@lists.linux.dev> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@linaro.org> > Cc: Ben Copeland <benjamin.copel...@linaro.org> > Cc: <lkft-tri...@lists.linaro.org> > Cc: <linux-...@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org> > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index b0f4d98036cd..005b92e6585e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -5932,6 +5932,7 @@ int pcie_set_readrq(struct pci_dev *dev, int rq) > { > u16 v; > int ret; > + unsigned int firstbit; > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus); > > if (rq < 128 || rq > 4096 || !is_power_of_2(rq)) > @@ -5949,7 +5950,10 @@ int pcie_set_readrq(struct pci_dev *dev, int rq) > rq = mps; > } > > - v = FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ, ffs(rq) - 8); > + firstbit = ffs(rq); > + if (firstbit < 8) > + return -EINVAL; > + v = FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ, firstbit - 8);
Hi Kees, Thank you for looking into this. These warnings are not a one time thing. the later versions of gcc can figure it out that firstbit is at least 8 based on the "rq < 128" (i guess), so we're adding bogus code. maybe we should just disable the check for gcc-8. Maybe something like this: diff --git a/include/linux/bitfield.h b/include/linux/bitfield.h index 5355f8f806a9..4716025c98c7 100644 --- a/include/linux/bitfield.h +++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h @@ -65,9 +65,20 @@ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask), \ _pfx "mask is not constant"); \ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((_mask) == 0, _pfx "mask is zero"); \ - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \ - ~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & \ - (0 + (_val)) : 0, \ + /* Value validation disabled for gcc < 9 due to __attribute_const__ issues. + */ \ + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__GNUC__ >= 9 && __builtin_constant_p(_val) ? \ + ~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & \ + (0 + (_val)) : 0, \ _pfx "value too large for the field"); \ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__bf_cast_unsigned(_mask, _mask) > \ __bf_cast_unsigned(_reg, ~0ull), \ I found similar patterns with ffs and FIELD_PREP here drivers/dma/uniphier-xdmac.c row 156 and 165 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor_regs.h row 17 Cheers, Anders