On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 7:32 PM Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:26:51PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > Upon a closer inspection it turns out that this is not the case - the > > ENABLE/DISABLE events are emitted when the *logical* regulator is > > enabled/disabled even if this does not involve a change in the state > > of the shared pin. > > It really should be the actual physical state change that triggers the > event.
I guess so, but this would require some non-trivial rework of the regulator core. We'd need some list of deferred notifications stored in memory for when the physical state actually changes. Bartosz
