Linux-Hardware Digest #793, Volume #9            Sun, 21 Mar 99 01:13:30 EST

Contents:
  Re: 3Com 3C905B ("Jeff Shultz")
  Re: Banshee (Greg White)
  Re: SoundBlaster Live! (Stephen Torri)
  Re: AOpen external modem FM56-EX on Linux, get it? (Sarah Kerrigan)
  two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok? (Sarah Kerrigan)
  Re: Diamond Stealth II S220 (Stephen Torri)
  Re: What videocard do you use? (Johan Kullstam)
  Please Help!!! ("Morgan Hayes")
  Re: two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: MS Intellimouse (Xavier Michelon)
  Re: What videocard do you use? (Ed Wilts)
  Re: 3Com 3C905B (Dan Nguyen)
  Re: 3Com 3C905B ("Jeff Shultz")
  SCSI controller/device advice (Dave)
  Re: All the current OSes are idiotic (was Re: Is Windows for idiots?) ("Wayne Liu")
  Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (ken brakey)
  Re: Bug in kernel/OSS in 2.0.36 an later? ("Marc Augspurger")
  Linux on Win/ce hardware? (john paulson)
  Re: two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok? ("Michael Faurot")
  Re: Playing sound files just get noise? ("Halojn")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Jeff Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3Com 3C905B
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:14:17 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: "Jeff Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 01:01:46 GMT, Welf wrote:

:>Will the 3Com 3C905-TX network card work with Redhat?
:>
:>
Redhat 5.1 and 5.2 - with one caveat - if you plan on dualbooting the
system and it's an ATX, you need to completely power down the system
(including the switch in back) before booting up into Linux after
being in the other OS. Otherwise the card will announce that it's NIC
ID is FF:FF:FF:FF:FF or something similar. It also won't work. 

Rebooting Linux into Linux works fine btw - perfectly normal. It's
just when (in my case) you are exiting NT 4.0 in order to boot up
Linux that you need to do a total shutdown. 


Jeff Shultz
http://www.netcom.com/~jbshultz
Here an OS, there an OS... I need more computers.



------------------------------

From: Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Banshee
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:34:41 -0800

"Glen L. Spangler" wrote:
> 
> Is the Voodoo Banshee supported at all in X?


http://glide.xxedgexx.com/3DfxRPMS_vb_glibc.html

Try the above URL for instructions and a binary download of an X server
for Banshee graphics cards.

(Posted using Netscape/XWindows 1024 x 768 /16-bit on a Banshee)


-- 
Greg White

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Torri)
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster Live!
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 02:02:26 +0000

I believe what I have read in this group is that the support for the
SoundBlaster Live is coming but not here yet. You could check around OSS or
some other places. Sorry for the not so specific news.

Stephen


Dave Moczulski wrote:

> does anyone know how to use sndconfig to get the SoundBlaster Live! to work.
> I'm currently running Mandrake Linux 5.3  it says that a PCI audio card is
> found, but unknown.  and i try everything but can't get it to work right.
> thanks.  a reply by email is aprreciated.
>
> Dave
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sarah Kerrigan)
Subject: Re: AOpen external modem FM56-EX on Linux, get it?
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:19:22 -0600

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> In article <7csvus$iap$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sarah Kerrigan wrote:
> >hey,
> >i need a modem that is compatible with Linux.  I know external modems are 
> >supposed to work but i just want to make sure.  I can get the AOpen FM56-
> >EX at a pretty good price.  anyone got anything good or bad to say about 
> >it?  thanks.
> Hi,
> external modems are good as long as they do not use USB interface.
> In case you are not sure whether you want external or internal,
> see the list of vendors who sell internal ones (Linux compatible):
> http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~comech/tools/CheapBox.html#modem
> 
> Cheers,
> Andrew
> 
> 
thanks to everyone for the tips on a modem.  i recently ordered 
the AOpen external.  i chose it b/c i will be pulling my winmodem 
out, which will give me a slot for a sound card.
thanks again

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sarah Kerrigan)
Subject: two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok?
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:21:04 -0600

hey,
my system currently dual boots to Win98 and Linux.  My 
sound card is the MX300 which i understand is not supported 
in Linux (yet).  anyway if i add a sound blaster 16, will 
this be a problem for Linux.  i dont expect it to be for 
Windows, so i wanted to make sure.

thanks

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Torri)
Subject: Re: Diamond Stealth II S220
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 02:00:11 +0000


==============6A603542111B04D630865F2B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Depends who you are asking. Redhat, which is what I run, No.  If you want to use
this for X-server then I would recommend Metrolink (www.metrolink.com). I have
used it and it works okay. Now warning, you need to pay for it ($40 US). Since I
didn't like how X-server what fighting me I decided to pay for it. As for the
other option of free, I guess then X-server is your only choice from XFree86. The
SVGA server is supposely what you need. The latest version 3.3.3.1 should have
the rendition support already in it. So it depends on how much work you want to
do.

Cheers.

Stephen


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> - is it supported? Uses the Rendition V2100 chip. Did not come across its name
> in the Hardware Compatibility Howto.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Arifi Koseoglu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

==============6A603542111B04D630865F2B
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Depends who you are asking. Redhat, which is what I run, No.&nbsp; If you
want to use this for X-server then&nbsp;I would recommend Metrolink (<A 
HREF="http://www.metrolink.com">www.metrolink.com</A>).
I have used it and it works okay. Now warning, you need to pay for it ($40
US). Since I didn't like how X-server what fighting me I decided to pay
for it. As for the other option of free, I guess then X-server is your
only choice from XFree86. The SVGA server is supposely what you need. The
latest version 3.3.3.1 should have the rendition support already in it.
So it depends on how much work you want to do.
<P>Cheers.
<P>Stephen
<BR>&nbsp;
<P>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>- is it supported? Uses the Rendition V2100 chip.
Did not come across its name
<BR>in the Hardware Compatibility Howto.
<P>Thanks in advance
<BR>Arifi Koseoglu
<BR>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<P>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
<BR><A 
HREF="http://www.dejanews.com/">http://www.dejanews.com/</A>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own</BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>

==============6A603542111B04D630865F2B==


------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: What videocard do you use?
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 Mar 1999 21:58:49 -0500

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech) writes:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Colin wrote:
> >The resolution and refresh rate also depends on what type of monitor you
> >are using.
> 
> Hmmm... what's `monitor'?

it's one of them carnivorous lizards.  i seen them grow to about two
feet long (with tail).

-- 
                                           J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
                                           [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
                                              Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: "Morgan Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please Help!!!
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:08:14 -0800

I have installed RedHat 5.1 on several computers and haven't had any problem
until now.  Here's the problem and I hope someone can help because I've
looked every where for the answer.

1.  When I begin installing RedHat using the 5.1 CDR it first says that
there is an error on /tmp/hdd (input/output error) and then I have a two
button choice.  1st button "retry" and second button is "skip."  HD works
just fine.

2.  If I retry nothing changes

3.  If I skip I can put the swap partition in with no problem but when I
want to put the root in I always get an error because boot partiton is too
big (no matter the size I try).

What's going on.  Could it be that the HDisk is 12 megs.  I make sure that
the linux partition is below the 1023 head.  I've tried a number of
locations for the partition.  And even tried removing the windoze partition
and install linux that way but I still get the same /tmp/hdd error as
above...  Can't figure it out PLEASE help if you have any suggestions!!!

Thank You!




------------------------------

Subject: Re: two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 03:22:44 GMT

According to Sarah Kerrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> my system currently dual boots to Win98 and Linux.  My 
> sound card is the MX300 which i understand is not supported 
> in Linux (yet).  anyway if i add a sound blaster 16, will 
> this be a problem for Linux.  i dont expect it to be for 
> Windows, so i wanted to make sure.

Shouldn't be a problem as long as you don't run into resource
conflicts.  I've read a number of stories with people running multiple
soundcards under Linux, so I see no reason why you couldn't leave one
in disabled.

-p.


------------------------------

From: Xavier Michelon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: MS Intellimouse
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:10:18 +0100

You will be able to use the wheel of your intellimouse as a third button. In
fact Unix mice are generally three buttons mice. By default, Linux handles three
button mice, and many programs (like Xemacs) use this third button. Under Linux,
owners of two buttons mice can emulate this third button by pressing both
buttons together. With your brand new intellimouse, you will just have to press
the wheel. Note that under X, you will need to have the MS Intellimouse Driver
(included in all the latest Linux Distributions).
PS : as you know, you can find softwares that will also allow you to use the
wheel to scroll : I personally recommand imwheel.
--
Xavier Michelon
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lee Luchford wrote :

> I'm considering buying an MS intellimouse to use in Linux. I know that there
> are various hacks to use the wheel for scrolling in X windows but what I
> need to know is does the wheel act like a third mouse button when you press
> it.  I don't want to buy it and find out that it is effectively a 2 button
> mouse
>      Thanks
>       Lee






------------------------------

From: Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: What videocard do you use?
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:48:27 -0600

Andrew Comech wrote:

> Hi,
> I would like to hear your experience with cheap videocards;
> precisely, at which resolutions YOU RUN THEM,
> and what is the  best refresh and color depth.
> Also, if there is something specific in the configuration.
>
> I am asking this because of my experience with Trident 9750:
> although it is mentioned as supported by Xfree86 3.3.3.1, the
> screen remains black at most resolutions (no errors reported).
> Other people complained about the same problem.
>
> This is the list of the cheapest videocards mentioned as supported
> by 3.3.3.1:
>
> /* $20-$30 on PriceWatch */
>
> S3 Virge DX, 4MB, AGP
> S3 Virge GX2, 4MB, 2x AGP
> Number Nine Revolution 3D, 4MB, AGP
> Diamond Multimedia Speedstar A50, chipset: SiS 6326, 8MB, AGP
>
> /* $30-$50 */
>
> ATI Xpert XL, chipset: ATI 3D RAGE PRO TURBO, 4MB, AGP
> STB Velocity 128, chipset: NVidia Riva 128, 8MB, 2x AGP
> ATI Xpert 98, chipset: ATI 3D RAGE PRO TURBO, 8MB, 2x AGP
>
> Most of these cards are mentioned in the newsgroups, but people
> usually do not specify the resolutions which are OK...

I'm using a Speedstar A50 at 1024x768 x16bit.  It's working fine with a
reasonably recent XFree (I believe you need 3.3.3.1or later.
I did have problems with XConfigurator generating a bad XF86Config file,
but an hour or two playing with the settings fixed that for me.

I'd suggest you look at http://www.linuxhardware.net and
http://www.searchlinux.com for some answers to the questions you're
asking.

Cheers,
    ..../Ed


------------------------------

From: Dan Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3Com 3C905B
Date: 21 Mar 1999 04:35:17 GMT

Jeff Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 01:01:46 GMT, Welf wrote:

: :>Will the 3Com 3C905-TX network card work with Redhat?
: :>
: :>
: Redhat 5.1 and 5.2 - with one caveat - if you plan on dualbooting the
: system and it's an ATX, you need to completely power down the system
: (including the switch in back) before booting up into Linux after
: being in the other OS. Otherwise the card will announce that it's NIC
: ID is FF:FF:FF:FF:FF or something similar. It also won't work.

With the 2.2 kernel running the version .99H of the driver, it
detected this and fixes the problems.

3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker 
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
  A 3Com network adapter is powered down!  Setting the power state 0103->0100.
  Setting the IRQ to 11, IOADDR to 0x1000.
  The PCI BIOS has not enabled the device at 0/104. Updating PCI command 0000->0005





-- 
           Dan Nguyen            | It is with true love as it is with ghosts;
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | everyone talks of it, but few have seen it.
http://www.cse.msu.edu/~nguyend7 |                    -La Rochefocauld, Maxims


------------------------------

From: "Jeff Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3Com 3C905B
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: "Jeff Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On 21 Mar 1999 04:35:17 GMT, Dan Nguyen wrote:

:>With the 2.2 kernel running the version .99H of the driver, it
:>detected this and fixes the problems.

Smooth - too bad its such a pain to update such stuff in Linux. (I'm
not going to risk my working system right now to upgrade and rebuild
my kernel and all). 

Thanks for the info though! 


Jeff Shultz
http://www.netcom.com/~jbshultz
Here an OS, there an OS... I need more computers.



------------------------------

From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SCSI controller/device advice
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 23:57:33 -0500

I'm thinking of buying some SCSI equipment, and was hoping for some
opinions or suggestions.

Currently I'm looking at the following, so I'm especially looking for any
gotcha's or experiences with them. I'll probably be using a 2.2 kernel.
(Are there any issues with getting the full potential out of Ultra2?)

- Adaptec 2940U2W controller
- Quantum Atlas III 9.1GB drives

I'm open to other's however, so if you have a favorite, please let me
know.

I'm also looking for a tape drive. Haven't decided on it yet. It needs to
be able to read 8mm DAT's though. Favorites?

Thanks for letting me know about any of the above!!
        Dave

=== (Crappy Sig #13)
Dave                    | E-Mail                        | The truth is out
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     | [EMAIL PROTECTED]       | there. Drink
BOFH                    | for PGP Public Key            | milk. MOO.

18 92 8E 39 D5 CD 26 60  3B B1 A2 59 4C 3A 76 5F


------------------------------

From: "Wayne Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: All the current OSes are idiotic (was Re: Is Windows for idiots?)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:33:30 -0800


Steve Russell wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>> On 15 Mar 1999 11:47:20 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph T. Adams) wrote:
>>
>> BTW Unix, generically speaking, is state of the art; it has not been
>> improved on and remains not only the most stable and reliable OS for
>> PC-class machines, but the *only* stable and reliable OS for PC-class
>> machines.
>
>Linux is made for the PC.  I believe Unix was made for big servers.
>
How big was the PDP-11?

>> >that it relies on a foundation of proven and mature computer science
>
>I've met a lot of old timer techies who have had the opinion that VMS
>was more stable and significantly better organized then Unix.  VMS was
>proprietary, Unix was very open and unix won out not entirely on its
>technical merits.  Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
>


Why people always care open or not open? I think not many IBM stuffs are
open, but most of Fortune 500-1000 companies are using and continously using
their server. I am using their OS and believe very good too. In your
people's eye. Besides Unix, Linux and Windows, what else? Is the world is so
small???????

wayne





------------------------------

From: ken brakey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 05:05:28 GMT



JR McConnell wrote:

> mike wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
> >the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
> >phone lines in the building and run them through
> >a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
> >be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
> >to do with those lines.
> >  Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
> >  I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
> >they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
> >a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
> >or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
> >throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
> >whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
> >like prespective employers .......
> >        Where will it all end???
> > Mike
>
>     Personaly, If one would wish to wast the money and resources to fret
> over little ol' me then they are more than welcome to. Better yet, just send
> the money to me personaly and I will be willing to save them the leg work
> and spill my guts about my boring, simple little life...
>
>     Make all checks payable to....
>
>     The number of people in this world makes it almost impossable to pick
> any person out just for the fun of it, the goverment is like a sleeping
> dragon. Unless one is fool enough to wake to ones existance there is little
> need to worry about it even caring you exist. Life is masured by thoes
> around you not thoes that never knew you...
>
>     Sorry, just my 2 cents worth, and it is not even worth that much. :)

TELL THAT TO KAREN SILKWOOD!


------------------------------

From: "Marc Augspurger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.kernel,linux.dev.laptop,linux.dev.sound,de.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Bug in kernel/OSS in 2.0.36 an later?
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 06:42:22 +0100

I have even no Idea but i have the same problem with the oss and the
terratec sound system base 64 ieven think its a problem with the new kernel
2.0.36 from linux
Shit happens:)
can you write me back when you have new Infrm.?
I will do the same for you thanks
Marc
Axel Morgner schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I believe there's a bug in all kernel versions older than 2.0.35 (incl.
>2.2.x) causing my box (Acer Extensa 368T notebook, on-board sound chip
>OPL3SAx (OPL3SA3 YMF715)) to crash when stopping music output. I
>remember there were a lot of changes from 2.0.35 to .36, but I can't
>figure out yet what exactly happened.
>
>The effect is consistently reproducable, with all possible settings of
>base, irq, dma, drivers (OSS/free+commercial), just trying to play some
>mp3-Files or making excessive use of /dev/dsp or /dev/audio.
>
>It seems that something is waiting for an IRQ event (?) and looping
>forever, no segfault, no kernel messages, no reboot. When stopping music
>output by killing the process (let's say 'cat sample.au > /dev/audio') I
>normally hear a high popp noise followed by a lower noise (very short
>delay < 1/10th of a second or so), but when the box hangs there is only
>the first higher popp noise.
>
>Anyone an idea of about what's going on?
>
>Ciao,
>
>-Axel.
>
>--
>This is Linux country ...
>               ... on a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot.



------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (john paulson)
Subject: Linux on Win/ce hardware?
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 05:42:47 GMT

  There was an ad in the local paper today for a 
company selling Philip's Velo 1 Win/ce devices 
with 8mb RAM/4mb Flash for $100.  That got me 
wondering if there is any linux port to such 
devices, or if the hardware on it is so hidden 
behind NDAs that such a thing is not feasible.

  Just wondering, as there are now several 
ports of linux to small devices, and here's a 
small device with keyboard and display.  It 
would be neat, though...

------------------------------

From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: two sound cards in a Linux machine?  ok?
Date: 21 Mar 1999 05:16:02 GMT

Sarah Kerrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: hey,
: my system currently dual boots to Win98 and Linux.  My 
: sound card is the MX300 which i understand is not supported 
: in Linux (yet).  anyway if i add a sound blaster 16, will 
: this be a problem for Linux.  i dont expect it to be for 
: Windows, so i wanted to make sure.

I've not tried this myself, however after recently installing the ALSA
sound drivers, it appears they have explicit support for handling
multiple sounds cards in the same machine.

Look here for more details:

        http://alsa.jcu.cz

-- 
==============================================================================
 Michael |     mfaurot     | Is a wedding successful if it comes off without
 Faurot  | phzzzt.atww.org | a hitch?

------------------------------

From: "Halojn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: Playing sound files just get noise?
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 06:04:15 +1300

Just woundering .. What does wavplay do ?? :)
A Bit Scruffy wrote in message <7d18l3$lvu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Wav files catted thru /dev/audio make a lovely screeching sound. Try a .au
>file or install wavplay.
>
>Scruffy
>
>Rene Nederhand schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>According to the readme file It cat won't work!
>>Try the recommended software
>>
>>Rene
>>
>>
>>Peter Herttrich wrote:
>>>
>>> In alt.os.linux.slackware Eric Wurbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Kevin White wrote:
>>> >>  (snip)
>>> >> cat filename.wav > /dev/dsp
>>> >> I just get noise.  It almost sounds like there is some pattern to it,
>>> >> like it's trying to play the right file, but is just really has a lot
>of
>>> >> messed up noise in it as well.  Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> > This is a byte ordering problem ! First make a test with a .au file
>>> > Then use sox to reverse byte ordering in your .wav file
>>>
>>> if i remember right the .au files will go through /dev/audio, not
>>> /dev/dsp.
>>>
>>> > best regards
>>>
>>> > Eric
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > le dernier h�bergeur gratuit (sans pub obligatoire...) frapp� ==>
>>> > http://altern.org
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>___________________________________________________________________________
_
>_
>>>           Microsoft has been doing a really bad job on their OS.
>>>                               Linus Torvalds
>>>
>___________________________________________________________________________
_
>_
>
>



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to