Linux-Hardware Digest #80, Volume #11            Mon, 23 Aug 99 13:13:42 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Matrox G400 Linux Drivers? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Token Ring 16/4 Speed Problem ("andy")
  Re: I HATE LT WIN MODEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Paul Flinders)
  Re: multi-Serial board ("Tony Platt")
  Re: Software-RAID 5 on Linux SMP ("Tony Platt")
  hp kayak/omnibook support (audio/lan) (Simon Oosthoek)
  Re: USB and Cams (Simon Oosthoek)
  Re: USB and Cams (Your Name)
  Re: psaux device ("Andrew J. Norman")
  hp kayak/omnibook support (audio/lan) (Your Name)
  Re: Any experience with Sony SDT9000 DDS-3 DAT drive? (Eric Wampner)
  New Computer / Dual CPU Newbie questions ("Mark Biegler")
  ATI Rage II ("Daniel T Pasher")
  Re: Newbie: null-modem or ethernet? ("Andrew J. Norman")
  Linux on AMD K6-2/400? (K. Eggleston)
  Can any kernel gurus please help me? SCSI Problem... (ChunkBoy)
  ATI VGA Wonder-16 ISA (Mircea)
  q: Sound on Compaq XL ? ("Walter Harms")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Matrox G400 Linux Drivers?
Date: 23 Aug 1999 15:53:17 +0100

Timo A. Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone knows how to make G400 work with RedHAt Linux 6.0?
Works like a charm using XFree86 3.3.4. I love it!

-- 
Alain Borel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: "andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Token Ring 16/4 Speed Problem
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:18:50 +0200

Hello,

Have a look on IBM's site for LANAID.

it's a pc-dos (what else) boot disk with a config utility to access the
firmare
in the card. �t's pretty self explanatory - you can set ring-speed,
auto-sensing
io's etc.

good luck

Dave Brown schrieb in Nachricht ...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Hotelling wrote:
>>Hey,
>>
>>Anybody know how to disable Auto Speed Detection in the token ring
>>module ibmtr.o?
>>
>>My Linux box has a Turbo 16/4 Token Ring card from IBM in it, and I'm
>>trying to network it with a token ring XStation.
>
>I don't have any experience with the "Turbo" card, but with the
>Auto 16/4 ISA card, you had to use the setup utility that came
>on a diskette (booted DOS of some form), to set the Ring speed.
>
>--
>Dave Brown   Austin, TX



------------------------------

From: Paul Flinders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,redhat.hardware.arch.intel
Subject: Re: I HATE LT WIN MODEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 23 Aug 1999 15:27:58 +0100


Jordi Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> liuyb wrote:
> 
> > I have a lt win modem, but I can't let it work in linux. I tried all means
> > and spend a lot of time , the result is the same. So I hate it.
> >   I HATE WIN MODEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > ------------------  Posted via CNET Linux Help  ------------------
> >                     http://www.searchlinux.com
> 
> Bad news:   there are also WIN-printers, e.g. HP deskjet 710.

True but the HP deskjet 710 can be used in Linux - see
        http://www.httptech.com/ppa


Actually Ghostscript pretty much treats all printers as dumb raster
output devices.

------------------------------

From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: multi-Serial board
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:31:50 +1000

Doesn't the card come with a dos driver for the AST setting ???

I have one of these (types) of cards and I think it has a dos driver....

Tony Platt


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7pr1tc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>My PC installed two system , the one is msdos 6.22 and another is Linux , I
use
>lilo to multi-boot msdos and linux.
>I bought a AST four port card , the board has two setting the one is normal
>mode and another is enhance mode.
>Normal mode com(1,2,3,4), irq(4,3,4,3) ,IO address(3f8,2f8,3e8,2e8) eath
com
>port works with msdos.
>If I use enhance mode (Of course I rearranged switch and jumper on board)
>It works on linux with setserial program and get cua(8,9,10,11), it uses 4
port
>simultaneously.
>On enhance mode the setting is com(1,2,3,4), share the same irq4,
>address(2A0,2A8,2B0,2B8), Interrupt Vector (2BF).
>When I use enhance mode, how do I do to make com ports work on Linux and
msdos
>and don't change board's setting, In other word, does msdos get interrupts
from
>com port when I using enhance mode?
>
>thanks in advance.
>



------------------------------

From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Software-RAID 5 on Linux SMP
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:36:20 +1000


Wolfgang wrote in message <7praau$rac$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Could anyone help me with my software RAID 5 problems on Linux SMP?
>
>Hardware facts:
>---------------
>Dual Pentium II MMX 350, ASUS P2???, 512MB RAM, on board AIC 7890/1 with
>IBM DDRS-34560W (4GB).
>RAID: 2 AHA 2940W hostadapters, 5 IBM DDRS-39130W disks (2+3), 32GB
>netto.
>Linux kernel 2.0.36 (tried also 2.2.5), SuSE 6.0 distribution.
>
>Problems:
>---------
>I installed the SW-RAID following the hints in the "Software-RAID"
>HowTo. Initially the RAID worked fine and without errors. After having
>filled the RAID up to halve of it's capacity, errors began to occur:
>
>*) a batch started shell script could not read a file/directory it just
>created. "No such file/directory". Running the same script from a shell
>prompt worked.


Don't forget to use ABSOLUTE paths to the file if run from a shell
script....

ie if the file was an executable file you need to

./xyzfile <<<<<wrong

./mntpoint/xyzfile <<<<<right

I got caught with this prob for a while <grin>

>*) created a tar-gzip file with tar czf. Verfying the generated tgz file
>with "tar tzf xxx.tgz >/dev/null" sometimes was OK sometimes had CRC
>failure or other tar specific errors. I mean, with the same file!


Try making a normal tar file (not compressed) and verify it.
Just to double check

Tony Platt



------------------------------

From: Simon Oosthoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hp kayak/omnibook support (audio/lan)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:54:29 +0200


Whoops! well this time you can see whom it's from ;-)

Hi,

I'm going to buy some new hardware for a project. At our company
(Ericsson EMN in the Netherlands) we're used to ordering at HP. But
before I go with the flow, I want to make sure that the audio and
network hardware is supported in Linux, because I really need both to
work!

The audio (of the kayak XA and the omnibook models) is just advertised
as:
 "16-bit Sound Blaster Pro�compatible stereo sound"
for the omnibook
and :
"Integrated Sound Blaster Pro�compatible, 16-bit, full duplex
stereo                    audio solution 
MPC-3 and Direct Sound V compatible"


Does anyone here know which chipset it is? (and if it's supported ;-)

The ethernet adapter is a weird one
Ethernet LAN interface:
� 32-bit autosensing HP NightDirector Plus 10/100 Ethernet card
(standard on some models or available as an HP accessory)
� LAN Remote Power On/Off and remote wake-up support

I've never heard of this one and it's not listed (under this name) in
the network drivers in the kernel....
Is this a different name for a well known chip?

Thanks for any help you can offer!

Simon

------------------------------

From: Simon Oosthoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: USB and Cams
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:51:45 +0200



Your Name wrote:

sorry, I guess I forgot to enter my name in the new netscape
installation....

Simon.

------------------------------

From: Your Name <"email address or Memo { distr.memoid"@memo.ericsson.se }>
Subject: Re: USB and Cams
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:49:30 +0200
Reply-To: The, address, given, above

Hoi Jeroen

I recently asked the same question here, so I think I can summarize the
results so far....

The short answer is that parralel and usb camera support is pretty close
to zero right now.

I think you have the same suspicions that I have: Microsoft is making
sure nobody other than windoze users gets support from the
manufacturers. I see no reason to keep specifications and driver-details
secret for products that have been on the market for a year or even
less. 

However, I did get some very helpful tips from Jarl Totland
(Business Data Consulting AS, Norway,  http://www.bdc.no)

The rest of the reply is his reply to me.

Cheers

Simon

Jeroen Bosma wrote:
> 
> Did anyone get an USB device running ? I want to have several webcams but
> the cams with an bttv chip are getting difficult to get.. All Linux folks
> bought them up....   :--))
> 
> So, did anyone get any USB webcam running under Linux ?
> 
> What are the problems with USB ? Why does Bill haven't got any problem's at
> all with these toys ?


There really aren't too many choices right now.

Basically, if you want USB, there is only one possibility right now; the
Creative WebCam II (or equivalent). Be warned though that the driver is
only
under development, along with the whole USB subsystem.

For parallel ports the default choice would be older versions of
QuickCam, 
either B-W or color. The PPC2 camera effort is probably not stable or
userfriendly enough for your use. 

You should probably check out PCMCIA based cameras, like the 
Winnow VideumCam Traveler, it has working Linux drivers:
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~bnoble/group/wnv-pcmcia/

>The desktop PC's are probably best off with a WinTV board and an analogue 
Probably: the main supported capture card on Linux are the bt848-based 
cards. Also a company is making an open capture card LML33 which
might be of interest.

For more info, see the pages for Video4Linux and Video4Linux Two 
linked from my page, especially V4L2's People&Projects:
http://millennium.diads.com/bdirks/peopleprojects.htm


Vyrdsamt,
-Jarl Totland

------------------------------

From: "Andrew J. Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: psaux device
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:33:56 GMT

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====

By design the PS/2 port will share interrupts, and must use interrupt line
12.  

As for connecting a device....PS/2 is NOT hot swappable.  This means under
no circumstances should you attach your mouse to the running system.
Instead make sure that your devices are attached before system power-up,
and when the machine boots the PS/2 drivers will take care of initializing
(for the most part, GPM and X have their own initializations too) the
mouse and keyboard.  

Next: While XFree86 does need to know the device the mouse is on (normally
we specify /dev/mouse and symlink this to /dev/psaux or which ever device
currently has a mouse on it) it also must know the protocol that the mouse
speaks.

In the case of a generic PS/2 mouse it should be able to use the generic
"PS/2" protocol (this is a standard and should work with any PS/2 mouse,
although some additional features will not be available) alternatively you
can specify one of the many PS/2 protocol versions (e.g. IMPS/2,
MouseManPlusPS/2 depending on whether you are using a Microsoft, or
Logitech mouse) see the man pages for XF86Config for details.


        Andrew J. Norman
______________________________________________________________
Dept. of Physics                        Phone: 
College of William & Mary               [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly;
 what is essential is invisible to the eye" -The Little Prince
______________________________________________________________

On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Thomas Edward White wrote:

> I have two PS/2 ports on the back of my computer. One of the ports is
> used by the keyboard. I have tried to use the other port for my mouse,
> without success.
> 
> I have enabled psaux support in the kernel, and, on bootup, the kernel
> reports that a PS/2 mouse port is available. I then specified the PS/2
> mouse on /dev/psaux in my XF86Config file. If I attach a mouse to the
> open PS/2 port, though, the two devices start fighting with each other.
> 
> Maybe they are using the same interrupt? If so, how to set the IRQ? I
> assume that setserial won't work with /dev/psaux.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom Ed White
> 
> 

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN8Fb1CRqxyk0Hh01AQHQjwP+NcuGArGwRx547ssqcXxwELZFRDZp0/0y
0CJ9Doh7eUFet2Xbq5hDWli//2u0RoGisPXA2QIG7+T5rSNGYW5jscjVhqrmE/FX
BJaEmay4od6kUjE6SQt1RaYj7klblFZ7nx8GpwPa9f5uYUhim85GwgDWPm3xvNSB
mo+khcVKdqc=
=kgQY
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====


------------------------------

From: Your Name <"email address or Memo { distr.memoid"@memo.ericsson.se }>
Subject: hp kayak/omnibook support (audio/lan)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:38:54 +0200
Reply-To: The, address, given, above

Hi,

I'm going to buy some new hardware for a project. At our company
(Ericsson EMN in the Netherlands) we're used to ordering at HP. But
before I go with the flow, I want to make sure that the audio and
network hardware is supported in Linux, because I really need both to
work!

The audio (of the kayak XA and the omnibook models) is just advertised
as:
 "16-bit Sound Blaster Pro�compatible stereo sound"
for the omnibook
and :
"Integrated Sound Blaster Pro�compatible, 16-bit, full duplex
stereo                    audio solution 
MPC-3 and Direct Sound V compatible"


Does anyone here know which chipset it is? (and if it's supported ;-)

The ethernet adapter is a weird one
Ethernet LAN interface:
� 32-bit autosensing HP NightDirector Plus 10/100 Ethernet card
(standard on some models or available as an HP accessory)
� LAN Remote Power On/Off and remote wake-up support

I've never heard of this one and it's not listed (under this name) in
the network drivers in the kernel....
Is this a different name for a well known chip?

Thanks for any help you can offer!

Simon

------------------------------

From: Eric Wampner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Any experience with Sony SDT9000 DDS-3 DAT drive?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:42:22 -0400



Mike Smith wrote:
> 
> Considering purchasing an SDT9000 DDS-3 tape unit.
> does anyone have any experience with getting an
> Sony SDT9000 DDS-3 DAT drive to work with linux
> kernel 2.2.5-15?

I own one, although I haven't realy done much with it. Works fine with
tar anyway. Would expect most anything else as well.

eric
--
Eric Wampner          Orlando Software Group, Inc.      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer           (407) 366-0909   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator     fax (407) 366-2721              [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "Mark Biegler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New Computer / Dual CPU Newbie questions
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:50:46 -0400
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Want to get a new system.  Haven't run Linux in 4 years, and then it was on
my 386/40.  Times have changed.  I now want to run Linux + VMWare with Win
'98 (for basic office apps and some graphics/audio-related software.)

Want to buy a new/up-to-date motherboard with "older"/cheaper CPU (read:
Celeron 400 or 433).

A supplier said "VMWare with Win '98 may suck up your whole CPU even when
idle due to busy/wait cycles."  (And, from reading reviews of Win '98 under
VMware, it does sound like it is slower.)  He suggested getting a dual-CPU
system so that one CPU would be recognized/used by VMware and the other one
could still perform Linux processing.

Question:  Is this correct?

Assuming it is correct, to give myself an upgrade path, I'd like to get a
dual-CPU Slot1 motherboard so that I can later move to Pentium III CPUs.
(This assumes I make a decision soon enough to find Slot1-based Celerons.  I
understand they've been discontinued and only the PPGA ones are left.)

Question: Are the dual Slot 1 CPU motherboards designed to support Celerons?
I can't determine if it will, as I've heard that the Socket 370-based
systems do something "special" in order to allow Celerons to multiprocess.

I don't really want to buy a dual 370 motherboard because I'll have to toss
it out when I want to move to the PIII in a year or two.

Question:  What's a good / basic AGP-based video card to use with Linux that
should also be supported under Win '98?  (read: cheap)


Many thanks,


Mark Biegler




------------------------------

From: "Daniel T Pasher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ATI Rage II
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:25:56 -0400

I've been trying to get my Rage Xpert 128 to work for over a month, and it
just doesn't look like it ever will, so I've decided to trade it in.  The
list of drivers in Red Hat 6.0 lists a Mach 64 Rage II board, but the people
who built my computer say that (i) no Mach 64 boards are available, and (ii)
the Rage II uses the same chipset as the Rage 128.  Any suggestions?

I'm willing to change manufacturers, if necessary.



------------------------------

From: "Andrew J. Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie: null-modem or ethernet?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:26:59 GMT

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====

One options that you may have not explored, is a 10Base2 network.  This
topology requires no hubs, is extremely cheap, and often is easier to
setup than a star topology.

The draw backs surrounding 10Base2 is that it is limited in bandwidth to
10megabits, and most modern 10/100 NICs have eliminated their coax
connector (as well as most hubs) which makes it difficult to link either
new machines or other subnets.

With that said a standard 10-2 network would consist of:

*) N network cards (normally NE2000 or compatible)
*) N bnc "T" connectors (usually supplied with NIC)
*) N-1 pieces of 50 Ohm coaxial cable (no less than 1.5 feet per link)
*) 2 50 Ohm bnc terminators.

The terminators will run you about $0.50 each, and coax will run you a
couple bucks if you buy pre-assembled (less if you crimp your own.) The
NICs themselves will run between $5-10 depending on where you are getting
them.

Point is that, for temporary LANs (designed say for transferring files from
an older machine to its new replacement) it's hard to do better.


Another options which has not been discussed is the "Null Modem Ethernet."

In this configuration two machines with standard 4-pair UTP are connected
directly via a cross over cable, and can be run at either 10/20/100/200
megabits depending on your cards (i.e. full duplex options will be
available)  It's main advantage is it's speed and cost.  Since there are
no hubs or switches used the total cost is NICs + wire, which if you crimp
your own (and it is hard to find pre-made cross overs) will run you maybe
a dollar (RJ45 connectors are about $0.25 if you buy in small quantities)

The disadvantage is that to add another station you must create a chain of
networks and setup appropriate routing.

Commonly this approach is only used in situation in which network
performance is critical (massive parallel machines {Beowulf} will use
this approach to minimize distance between processors and ensure that each
node receives it's full bandwidth on the ether) although several companies
are now selling "Network In A Box" solutions which are nothing more than
two NICs and a cross over (sneaky of them isn't it)

There are a number of other methods for hooking machines together, but in
general the above mentioned two are probably the only ones which pertain
to your situation.
 
        Andrew J. Norman
______________________________________________________________
Dept. of Physics                        Phone: 757-221-3571
College of William & Mary               [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly;
 what is essential is invisible to the eye" -The Little Prince
______________________________________________________________

On 22 Aug 1999, Kovalev wrote:

> Hello,
> Need to connect 3 comps together, they're almost in the same place,
> and I was wondering, what would be better-to have some ethernet
> startup kit, like 2-3 NIC, hup and some cable, or just
> hook them up via "null-modem".
> If the last one, any ideas/links, how exactly could I do this?
> What soft do I need? Didn't find anything on "null-modem on linux"
> so far. Any disadvantages?
> If the first one (ethernet), what will happen if the hub is "10/100"
> 2 out of 3 NIC are 10/100 pci, but one NIC just needs to be ISA (old
> machine). Is there any 10/100 ISA cards out there?
> Does it make any sense to have 10/100 hub if one of the cards is 10 at most?
> Will it work with it at all?
> Any suggestions/links/advice - strongly appreciated.
> 
> 
> 

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN8FoQyRqxyk0Hh01AQH2MwP/RRAJANQWZmcmSFNrhsUAKxzhPPKNdLz4
Ti6XAw+1TkJQZIDSBlFaocv8NTUA09kpziRApFPGzomcb33bQFtDDJF3sJ8iRSAk
PY9I9vEdFFi3IobJKpKXPuU73SaDhZ2Fvlqw/4YLL1ckyIp2ZkveUa+53t7yOHRr
JHp9fMgxyC0=
=Vd/E
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (K. Eggleston)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,cs.amd,cx686.amdk6.and.others
Subject: Linux on AMD K6-2/400?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:40:56 -0500

Out of desperation for more speed for M$ NT 4.0, I went to my local 
bargain geek-shop and bought a Gigabyte motherboard along with AMD K6-
2/400 chip.  This is the first time I've bought a non-Intel MB, but 
everyone told me I'd have no probs.

But, I must get BSOD's in NT at least once a day.  And it's stuff that 
specifically mentions the processor.. One of its favorites is complaining 
something about AMD EXCEPTION IRQ1 is LESS_OR_EQUAL .. Not quite sure 
exactly what it means, but it happens all the time.  Other bizarre 
behavior as well.. StarCraft doesn't want to run smoothly, for some 
reason.. Can't figure out if its the vid card to blame on this one, tho 
(Voodoo3/2000)..

Anyway, these BSOD's are going to really get on my nerves. I canst stands 
no flakey system!

And now, for the Linux part of this post--  Has anyone had a similar 
experience with AMD chips -- that Windoze would bomb or act bad 
specifically for reasons tied to the AMD chip -- and replace Windoze with 
Linux and experienced 100% hardware-reliable performance?

I bought this AMD chip because so many people swore that it was a good 
bet.  The Gigabyte MB, I was also told, was a great MB..  Trying to make 
my anti-monopoly statement and save a few bucks at the same time.  I 
guess I got what I paid for!


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ChunkBoy)
Subject: Can any kernel gurus please help me? SCSI Problem...
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:32:42 GMT

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:36:49 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ChunkBoy)
wrote:

        Help!  I'm trying to setup my SCSI CD-ROM on an old Sound
Blaster 16 with a SCSI-2 interface. I use this same configuration with
FreeBSD, NT, Win95, Win3.1/DOS with NO PROBLEMS!  I'm using Redhat
Linux 5.2 for intel (2.0.36 kernel).   I entered the correct option at
boot time (LILO), which is:
aha152x=0x340,11,7,1
        It didn't work when configured as a kernel module, but then I
recompiled the kernel with support for this adapter built in, but now
I get this error message at boot up:

aha152x: processing commandline: ok
aha152x: BIOS test: passed, detected 1 controller(s)
aha152x0: vital data: PORTBASE=0x340, IRQ=11, SCSI ID=7,
reconnect=enabled, parity=enabled, synchronous=disabled, delay=100,
extended translation=disabled
aha152x: trying software interrupt, lost.
aha152x: IRQ 11 possibly wrong.  Please verify.
scsi0 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.18 $
scsi : 1 host.
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 0, scsi0, channel 0, id
0, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 0, scsi0, channel 0, id
0, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 1, scsi0, channel 0, id
1, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 1, scsi0, channel 0, id
1, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 2, scsi0, channel 0, id
2, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 2, scsi0, channel 0, id
2, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 3, scsi0, channel 0, id
3, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 3, scsi0, channel 0, id
3, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 4, scsi0, channel 0, id
4, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 4, scsi0, channel 0, id
4, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 5, scsi0, channel 0, id
5, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 5, scsi0, channel 0, id
5, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 6, scsi0, channel 0, id
6, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 6, scsi0, channel 0, id
6, lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00

        I KNOW the port address and IRQ are correct - again this works
fine with other OS's, like FreeBSD, but I want to run Linux on this
box.  The sound/SCSI card is a Sound Blaster CT-1770 SB16-SCSI-2 --
this is NOT a plug-and-pray card!
        PLEASE HELP! I would appreciate ANY info.

Thanks!
-Chunky

------------------------------

From: Mircea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ATI VGA Wonder-16 ISA
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:14:13 -0400

Hello-

If someone ever got this piece of crap working with X, please tell me
how. It's the only ISA video card I have for setting up a 486 spare
machine. I've tried every server and every setting I could think of in
XF86Config, and it's still a no-go. Even the mono server won't do. The
card has a ATI 18800 chip (described on ati's web site as one of their
earliest ones) and 256 or 512k video RAM - I can't tell. I'd be more
than happy to have it running in 16 colors, or even monochrome, if
there's no other way, but the last thing I need is have to go out and
buy another ISA video card. I know the card is good, I've seen it work
in W3.1  just before installing Linux, and in text mode it's okay.

Thank you in advance,

Mircea
stamasd at excite dot com

------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: q: Sound on Compaq XL ?
Date: 22 Aug 1999 14:03:20 GMT

I got an old Compaq XL 450. Interesstingly there is even an (old ) HOWTO for
it. So i got everything working (onboard)-scsi and ethernet but not the sound.
The chips is an AD1847 and is supported thru the AD1848-driver. but everytime
i try to load the modul i get a "device or resource busy". unfortunaly the
driver doesnt autoprobe and my config seems to be faulty.
Did anyone get this thing working ?
i tried (with variations) this:
insmod ad1848 io=0x530 irq=5 dma=1 deskpro_xl=1

note: there is also a opl3 at 0x388

        walter

-- 
=====
"I will venture just one question, Doctor.  What precisely do you
 *do* in there?"
"Argue, mainly!"
=====

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to