Linux-Hardware Digest #459, Volume #12 Sat, 11 Mar 00 21:13:06 EST
Contents:
OnStream ADR50 (Sami Shaaban)
Re: Anyone got RAID going using a DPT controller ? (LhD Administrator)
Re: Red Hat 6.0 and Gigabyte GA-630 (LhD Administrator)
Re: Linux and ASUS P3C-S Series - Rambus/RDRAM issues? (LhD Administrator)
Re: Asus P3C-D (dual) (LhD Administrator)
Re: Suggestions for SMP motherboards... (LhD Administrator)
Re: supermicro s2dgu (LhD Administrator)
Re: AOpen ALN-201 Ethernet Card on RedHat6.1 not working (LhD Administrator)
Re: which hub? ("David ..")
Real audio, /dev/mixer (Martin Booth)
Re: CMI8330 HOWTO ("Jim E.")
COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Anybody really good at monitor-settings? (GarbMan)
Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux sucks (JEDIDIAH)
Re: problem with gcc...urgent ! (Manfred =?iso-8859-1?Q?Preu=DFig?=)
Re: ftape with 2.2.x kernel (scott)
Modem trouble ("Aceinthehole")
Re: Digital Cameras and Linux (Thumbnail Access!) (Douglas E. Mitton)
Re: CMI8330 HOWTO ("Jim E.")
Searching afther 'oki4linux-1.0.tar.gz'. ("Bengt-Arne Johansson")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sami Shaaban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OnStream ADR50
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:37:30 GMT
I just ordered an ADR50 and installed it on a RedHat 6.1 system. When
using it with some common backup software (Amanda), certain backup
volumes
written to the tape contain unexpected EOFs (tar volumes written to tape
with dd).
Upon further exploration, I found that the kernel was complaining of the
following:
Mar 11 10:02:23 nurelm kernel: st0: Error with sense data: Info
fld=0x40, Current st09:00: sense key Medium Error
Mar 11 10:02:23 nurelm kernel: Additional sense indicates Block sequence
error
I am using a Tekram DC-390F SCSI card, which seems quite well supported
and is automatically detected and configured by the OS. I tried another
backup tape in case the media was hosed.
I would be grateful for any hints as to what's going on.
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone got RAID going using a DPT controller ?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:25 GMT
Courtney Thomas wrote:
> I've run into all kinds of foul weather trying to get a PM2144UW going
It appears that the W-only version works.
Not too much info here, but encouraging nonetheless -- some of the
resources may be helpful:
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?353
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat 6.0 and Gigabyte GA-630
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:26 GMT
Ashley Milne wrote:
> Is it possible to use this video card under a Red Hat GUI?
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?775
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and ASUS P3C-S Series - Rambus/RDRAM issues?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:27 GMT
Shane Jarych wrote:
> Any success stories? Any horror stories?
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?803
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Asus P3C-D (dual)
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:27 GMT
Francisco de Borja Rodriguez wrote:
> I'm looking for information on the current status
> (supported/unsupported) for the PIII mainboard
> ASUS P3C-D Mainboard that based on the all
Rate it (for Linux compatibility and performance)
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?803
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Suggestions for SMP motherboards...
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:26 GMT
Jim Morrissey wrote:
>
>
> Anyone have suggestions for purchasing a dual to quad processor (any
> speed..$$ are important) motherboard that is comaptible with RH 6.0 or
> greater??? Thanks,
Check out the motherboards category at http://www.linhardware.com
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: supermicro s2dgu
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:34 GMT
first last wrote:
> any one using it does it work ok ??
Yes, check out:
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?30
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: LhD Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AOpen ALN-201 Ethernet Card on RedHat6.1 not working
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:30:33 GMT
Raif Barbaros wrote:
> I cannot get AOpen ALN-201 Ethernet Card to work on RedHat6.1 (server
> install).
Hmm, have you tried the PCI NE2000 drivers?
It *should* work -- see
http://www.linhardware.com/db/dispproduct.cgi?DISP?424
LhD Administrator
Linux Hardware Database
http://www.linhardware.com
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: which hub?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:46:27 -0600
I use the Office Connect 8port 3Com and it works great. It's not a Cisco
but then I didn't pay Cisco's price either.
You can check prices at
www.pricewatch.com
or
www.pricescan.com
Just my 2 cents
--
Due to extreme SPAM abuse! Remove z's and x's from above to reply.
Thnak the spammer's A..holes that they are. Still can't reach me?
Then your address range is already blocked due to previous spam.
Sorry! I hate spam!!
------------------------------
From: Martin Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Real audio, /dev/mixer
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:58:50 +0000
Dear Folks,
Sorry for the cross-posting, I'm a bit pushed for time - that is if
anyone knows the answer that is. I have a problem in that I would like
to download a real audio file and copy it to CD ( a present for
someone). I've tried to download the real audio file but it just has a
link to pnm://..... . I've installed real audio on my Linux system (more
of that later) and tried to save it to a file. I've, naively, tried to
replace the /dev/dsp with a file and hope that would catch the data
before it hit my sound card. Needless to say it didn't work. Anyone know
how to get the data to disk in a readable format?
My system is slakware 7.0, kernel 2.2.14, sound card sound blaster using
es1370. Realplayer 5.0.
Any help would be appreciated.
My realplayer only works if I change the settings to:
crw-rw-r-- 1 root sys 14, 0 Jul 18 1994 /dev/mixer
from:
crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 14, 0 Jul 18 1994 /dev/mixer
But then mxaudio won't allow my changing the volume and I have to change
it back, any idea why rvplayer5.0 won't work with write privileges to
/dev/mixer?
Martin Booth
P.S. In case of E-mail reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:52:44 -0600
From: "Jim E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CMI8330 HOWTO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi, I've got an Asus P5AB with CMI8330 integrated audio, and I can't
> seem to get ahold of the CMI8330 HOWTO anywhere (sites are down and
> google cache barfs). It is my understanding that isapnptools is
> deprecated with 2.2.x+ kernels (I'm running 2.2.14), so the mini-HOWTO
> is out of date.
-- <SNIP>
I use the same board with an AMD K6-2 350 and kernel 2.2.14. To get the
sound working I config the drivers into the kernel and don't use mods.
PNP is not enabled. My sound settings from the xconfig menu looks like
this.
Sound card support = Y
OSS Sound modules = Y
100% sound blaster compatibles (SB 16/32/64... etc) = Y
I/O base = 220
SB IRQcheck = 5
SB DMA = 1
SB 16 bit DMA = 5
MPU 401 I/O base = 330
SB MPU 401 IRQ = -1
HTH, good luck.
Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Subject: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal?
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 00:30:46 GMT
If you were going to put an "external modem" on your PC,
which is the most optimal: COM1 or COM2 to avoid clashing
with the Mouse or other highly used periphs using COM1 or COM2?
I.e. what would give the best system performance because of
non-clashing interrupts. The mouse even though it is not
plugged into a COM port uses a COM interrupt, right?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: GarbMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anybody really good at monitor-settings?
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:20:45 -0600
Lars Olsson wrote:
>
> I run Linux with XFree86. I have a no-name monitor.
> It is 17" and is capable of 85Hz @ 1024x768, and
> run at that in Windows98 (shiver).
> In Linux it runs at 75Hz. I�ve located the line in
> XF86Config that the server uses to set that setting,
> and I�ve tried to edit it. No luck. My question:
> There�s a value on that line called "DotClock", and
> it�s not mentioned in my low-budget manual for the
> monitor. All that�s covered is hor. and ver. freq. for the
> different settings. Here�s what it says for the setting I would like
> to use:
> Horizontal freq = 68.677 kHz
> Vertical freq = 84.997 Hz
> It also mentions some info on the timing chart (T1-T5)
> and Sync Polar. Is there any way to calculate the "DotClock"
> from this info? Any help is greatly appr.
> /Lars
Have you read the XFree86-Video Timings HOWTO?
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/XFree86-Video-Timings-HOWTO.html
There's also a site mentioned in it that may be of some help.
http://altern.org/vii/programs/linux/read-edid/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Subject: Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal?
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:20:53 GMT
If your using a PS/2 mouse it uses IRQ 12 and if your using a USB mouse
it uses the IRQ that is assigned to the USB ports, so you won't get a
IRQ conflict. As for which COM port to use I have used both for a modem
and never seen a differance between the two. All the COM ports for new
PC's are 115K in speed so any current modem won't overwhelm them.
In article <8aeofn$24t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you were going to put an "external modem" on your PC,
> which is the most optimal: COM1 or COM2 to avoid clashing
> with the Mouse or other highly used periphs using COM1 or COM2?
>
> I.e. what would give the best system performance because of
> non-clashing interrupts. The mouse even though it is not
> plugged into a COM port uses a COM interrupt, right?
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JEDIDIAH)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.portable,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: Linux sucks
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:21:44 GMT
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 22:27:18 GMT, Ron Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm sorry, but I don't think this gentleman's position is based upon a
>"windows centric" way of thinking. I'm not a networking guru or know-it-all,
>but I have been networking since the late 80's, and with Linux and the
>Internet since 1994. I've been in the computer business (mostly software)
>for 20 years. I have to agree: Most Linux documentation *does* suck. Big
Some of it does. Some of it doesn't. Claiming that 'most' does is
quite disputable and likely beyond your experience.
>Time. As does support from Red Hat -- you ever try to get an answer from
>them, or find it on their web site?
I started with an Infomagic CD pack and a pamphlet and the
ability to explore and to read. I've seldom needed much
beyond that. Although there are the occasional tricky bits.
>
>However, that being said, Linux, and the supporting Linux community, is a
>great Ideal. It's capabilities as a networking engine runs circles around
>anything I've ever seen from Microsoft (or Novell) -- and at a fraction of
>the cost (mostly free). The support community (newgroups, mail lists, web
>sites, etc...) does fill in most of the documentation gaps. And I've always
>found someone online who is helpful and knowledgable to assist me with my
>most difficult problems.
>
>My biggest problem with the existing documentation is that there are never
>any real examples. People are quick to point you to "man" and "HowTo", but
The NET howtos are actually chock full of them. Plus there have
been shiny happy tools available (even in Slackware, but just
minus the eye candy) for networking for quite some time.
>man pages never have any examples of how to use the command, and God help you
>if your configuration differs ever so slightly from that of the configuration
>used in the HowTo guide you happen to be studying.
This can be true of documentation in general if you don't have
any real mind of your own. It documentation, not a program that
fancies itself being 'complete'.
>
>Again, that said, the monetary costs of designing, developing and
>implementing Linux-based systems is miniscule compared to comparable Windows
>system. I will give Microsoft credit for having a helluva KnowledgeBase
>which has almost always helped me when I've had a sticky Windows problem.
>But Windows is a costly proposition.
>
>Therein lies your trade off: Money or elbow grease.
Actually it was neither for me. Win95 was more problematic
on my hardware. Despite the initial effort, my net 'elbow
grease' ended up being less.
You repeat the foolish myth that all of us Linux enthusiasts
are some sort of strange, perverse masochists that like to
fabricate unecessary effort for ourselves.
>
>For the time being, I think the best solution for Linux documentation is what
>someone said earlier in this thread: When you finally do learn how to do
>something, share that knowledge with others. Either document and post your
>findings on the appropriate newsgroup, or browse the newsgroups periodically
>to find someone with a question you can answer.
>
>My two cents.
>
>-ron
>
>JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:52:53 -0500, mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> > I've been pulling my hair out with Linux for about a year now
>> >and. I think that it has a tremendous potential, but the pulling out
>> >of my hair is a testament to the poor documentation.
>> > I am grateful that there is a lot of it out there, but there's a lot
>> >that is missing. There are many gaps which are hard to tie in.
>> >Many unanswered questions. I have yet to find a doc that
>> >explains all the steps in detail of sending and receiving mail
>>
>> Actually, if you are looking at things from a Windows
>> centric perspective then there isn't a difference
>> between the two actually. There's nothing to learn
>> until you start using local mail or a mail server.
>>
>> >and what happens in between and the way info is routed.
>> >I have not found detailed tcp/ip stuff also which explains
>> >all the details of sending packets between computers and the
>> >internals of the packets and the exchange of info betweens
>> >the system to establish connections. I read most of the docs
>>
>> So? You really don't need to know that bit. The NET
>> howtos are more than adequate when it comes to setting
>> up various TCP/IP networks. They actually go through it
>> step by step. They cover the relevant details and don't
>> bury you unrelevant bits (like the PPP Howto does if
>> you're trying to use it like the ISP-Hookup howto).
>>
>> This is actually a good example of a Linux Doc that
>> ISN'T crappy.
>>
>> [deletia]
>>
>> --
>> |||
>> Resistance is not futile. / | \
>>
>>
>> Need sane PPP docs? Try penguin.lvcm.com.
>
>--
>Ron Parker
>Software Creations http://www.scbbs.com
>TradeWinds Publishing http://www.intl-trade.com
>TradePoint Los Angeles http://www.tradepointla.org
>SiteDirector Security Server http://livepublish.scbbs.com
>Civil War Online Library http://civilwar.scbbs.com
>
>
--
|||
Resistance is not futile. / | \
Need sane PPP docs? Try penguin.lvcm.com.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:54:21 +0100
From: Manfred =?iso-8859-1?Q?Preu=DFig?=
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.networking,linux.dev.kernel
Subject: Re: problem with gcc...urgent !
fatjack wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I downloaded the latest driver for my NIC from manuifacturer website. It
> said user have to use gcc to complie the driver then add the driver to
> kernel. After compling, then i ran "insmod xxx" (where xxx is the name of
> the complied driver and it is part of the instruction). However, an error
> message said the version that i complied is for kernel 2.0.36, and the
> version of kernel that i am using now is 2.2.12 with CorelLinux 1.0. It
> pisses me off........>(
>
> need help......plz
>
> yours,
>
> fatjack
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem there are the sources of the driver you had downloaded there
and not the compiler. Every kernel has a version as you know but every
driver too. That is the kernel version the driver is made for. The
problem is not how the compiler builds this driver but it is the source
code itself. Since the interface the kernel contacts the driver or vice
versa is changed for some reasons sometimes through version changings
the version of the kernel and the version of the driver has to fit.
Sometimes the change is only the version number so you only has to
change the version number referenced inside the source. But sadly the
kernel you use is a 2.2.xx kernel and the kernel the driver is made for
is a 2.0.xx. There are a lot of changes made to the kernel from 2.0.xx
to 2.2.xx so it is very unlikely the driver is able to work there. The
changings are partly on very often used functions inside the kernel so
great chances are that even one of the function calls or variable uses
inside the driver you have downloaded uses one of these calls and
therefor goes down on knees if you try to use the driver. If your NIC is
not supported through original kernel drivers or the manufacturer has
some new driver (ask for it -possibly not tested to be stable and
therefor not installed to be downloaded by visitor of website) you have
to change to one of the older kernels best to 2.0.36.
I'm very sad not to be able to give you a better answer but that's linux
greetings
Manfred Preussig
------------------------------
From: scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftape with 2.2.x kernel
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:30:07 GMT
Sorry, but I've tried this version also with the same results. I Even
got it from the same page you suggested. I'm almost about to reinstall
Linux again, just to know I'm starting from scratch, and then try
compiling ftape. I hope somone can talk me out of it.
Scott
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>
> scott wrote:
>
> > This group has saved me before, and I hope it can again.
> >
> > I have read all of the discussions concerning ftape, as well as
the
> > websites devoted to ftape. I understand that when compiling ftape with
the
> > 2.2.x kernels, you get various fdc-io.c timeout errors. It was
suggested
> > to use the latest unstable version of ftape (4.03)
>
> The latest unstable version of ftape is not 4.03. Go to URL:
> http://www.instmath.rwth-aachen.de/~heine/ftape/development.html
>
> You will want both the ftape suite and the ftape-tools.
>
> > when compiling it with
> > kernel version 2.2.x and later. I have done this and the results are
the
> > same. I even tried installing an rpm version 4.02 without success.
Though
> > there were no errors, it didn't seem to install anyways. So my
question is
> > has anyone had any success installing ftape on a 2.2.x kernel? I've
got so
> > many residual ftape files on my system, I don't know which one is which
> > anymore. I'm afraid some of these might confuse a potential successful
> > installation at a later date.
> >
> > OK, to recap. I would like to install ftape on a 2.2.x kernel
WITHOUT
> > any errors. I've got RedHat 6.0, and a Iomega Ditto 3200 1.6 GB tape
drive
> > that uses the floppy controller. I've tried the latest version of
ftape.
> > Where should I go next? And please inform me if and how I should clean
out
> > my previous failed ftape files to avoid confusion. Thanks everyone.
> >
> > --
> > Posted via CNET Help.com
> > http://www.help.com/
>
> --
> Jean-David Beyer .~.
> /VShrewsbury, New Jersey /( )
Registered Linux User 85642. ^^-^^
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Aceinthehole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Aceinthehole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Modem trouble
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:49:05 GMT
Hello, new to linux and this ng, can anyone help me out to find out if my
modem is supportable. Trouble is, farty old windoze won't let me browse the
grommit site (or any site for that matter) to find out to see if it's listed
(this after a reinstall of everything too, I'm starting to hate windope).
Anyway, it's a PC Tel v90 kflex HSP 56k PCI yankee doo dah voice jobbie.
Windole says it is using hardware flow control, so presumably this is
favourable to linux from what I can find out.
If anyone can help please do, I really can't afford to buy another modem.
Replies by e-mail if possible please or I might never get them!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton)
Subject: Re: Digital Cameras and Linux (Thumbnail Access!)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:49:58 GMT
This is a "slightly" off topic question.
I have modified this program to download the thumbnail images ... they
are much smaller and faster for a quick look. Now I find that they
are not a format recognized by any of the utilities on my system. I
did a few searches but I guess I'm not asking the right questions.
Does anyone know of a utility that will allow these thumbnails to be
viewed or converted into some usable form?
Thanks in advance!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton) wrote:
>Thank you VERY much for this link! I like this utility. GPhoto is
>nice from a GUI point of view BUT command line utilities like this are
>useful for un-attended or batch operation.
>
>I was looking for something like this when I found gphoto, now I have
>a chance at taking pictures from my web page! :-)
>
>By the way I am using a Fuji DX-10 as well. Very good camera for its
>price and intended use!
>
>Thanks again!
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Wandel) wrote:
>
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>Tom Rosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>I have a Fujifilm MX-1200 digital camera that connects to the
>>>back of my computer via a serial port. The software for this
>>>camera has Windows 98/NT and Mac versions, but the authors didn't
>>>have the forsight to include Linux software. Basically, from
>>>what I can tell, it connects using some kind of Twain driver so
>>>it can be accessed from Photoshop and Corel Draw and all of those
>>>other wonderful expensive and buggy graphics programs. Does
>>>anybody have any experience hooking up this camera, or any
>>>Fujifilm MX-series camera, or any digital camera in general, to
>>>Linux. I'm currently running Mandrake 7, which is compatable
>>>(sort of) with RedHat. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!
>>
>>I have a Fuji DX10 (predecessor to the MX1200) and I use this program:
>>
>> http://topo.math.u-psud.fr/~bousch/fujiplay.html
>>
>>It does exactly what a digital camera download program should do in
>>my opinion:
------------------------------------------------
Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
'City of the Thousand Islands'
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
Other: mitton.dyn.ml.org
SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 20:04:56 -0600
From: "Jim E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CMI8330 HOWTO
Need to add I dual boot using Loadlin. So there was no need to enable
PNP in the kernel.
>
> I use the same board with an AMD K6-2 350 and kernel 2.2.14. To get the
> sound working I config the drivers into the kernel and don't use mods.
> PNP is not enabled. My sound settings from the xconfig menu looks like
> this.
>
> Sound card support = Y
> OSS Sound modules = Y
> 100% sound blaster compatibles (SB 16/32/64... etc) = Y
> I/O base = 220
> SB IRQcheck = 5
> SB DMA = 1
> SB 16 bit DMA = 5
> MPU 401 I/O base = 330
> SB MPU 401 IRQ = -1
>
> HTH, good luck.
>
> Jim
------------------------------
From: "Bengt-Arne Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Searching afther 'oki4linux-1.0.tar.gz'.
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 02:09:34 GMT
Hi
I'm searching afther a printer driver that was at
'ftp://develop.dacotec.net/oki4linux-1.0.tar.gz' earlier. It's now gone and
I have not find it on any other place on th net.
If someone knows where to find it or has it then please tell me.
Or if there is any newer whit maybe a new name or something...
Thanks
Bengt-Arne
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
