On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulni...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Fixes the following 2 issues in the driver:
> 1. Left shifting a signed integer is undefined behavior. Unsigned
>    integral types should be used for bitwise operations.
> 2. The delay scales from 0x0010 to 0x20000 by powers of 2, but udelay
>    will result in a linkage failure when given a constant that's greater
>    than 20000 (0x4E20). Agressive loop unrolling can fully unroll the
>    loop, resulting in later iterations overflowing the call to udelay.
>
> 2 is fixed via splitting the loop in two, iterating the first up to the
> point where udelay would overflow, then switching to mdelay, as
> suggested in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst.
>
> Reported-by: Tomasz PaweĊ‚ Gajc <tpg...@gmail.com>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/678
> Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> index 183ff3d25129..2bc12812f52f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  #define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT      0x0010
>  #define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT    0x0100
>  #define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT      0x20000
> +#define APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX    20000
>
>  #define APPLESMC_READ_CMD      0x10
>  #define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD     0x11
> @@ -157,14 +158,23 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *applesmc_led_wq;
>  static int wait_read(void)
>  {
>         u8 status;
> -       int us;
> -       for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> +       unsigned int us;
> +
> +       for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) {
>                 udelay(us);
>                 status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
>                 /* read: wait for smc to settle */
>                 if (status & 0x01)
>                         return 0;
>         }
> +       /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */
> +       for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> +               mdelay(us);
> +               status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
> +               /* read: wait for smc to settle */
> +               if (status & 0x01)
> +                       return 0;
> +       }
>
>         pr_warn("wait_read() fail: 0x%02x\n", status);
>         return -EIO;
> @@ -177,10 +187,10 @@ static int wait_read(void)
>  static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port)
>  {
>         u8 status;
> -       int us;
> +       unsigned int us;
>
>         outb(cmd, port);
> -       for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> +       for (us = APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT; us < APPLESMC_UDELAY_MAX; us <<= 1) {
>                 udelay(us);
>                 status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
>                 /* write: wait for smc to settle */
> @@ -196,6 +206,23 @@ static int send_byte(u8 cmd, u16 port)
>                 udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT);
>                 outb(cmd, port);
>         }
> +       /* switch to mdelay for longer sleeps */
> +       for (; us < APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT; us <<= 1) {
> +               mdelay(us);
> +               status = inb(APPLESMC_CMD_PORT);
> +               /* write: wait for smc to settle */
> +               if (status & 0x02)
> +                       continue;
> +               /* ready: cmd accepted, return */
> +               if (status & 0x04)
> +                       return 0;
> +               /* timeout: give up */
> +               if (us << 1 == APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT)
> +                       break;

Sorry, I need to modify the first for loop in this function to break
out properly. v2 inbound.

> +               /* busy: long wait and resend */
> +               udelay(APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT);
> +               outb(cmd, port);
> +       }
>
>         pr_warn("send_byte(0x%02x, 0x%04x) fail: 0x%02x\n", cmd, port, 
> status);
>         return -EIO;
> --
> 2.23.0.351.gc4317032e6-goog
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Reply via email to