> -----Original Message-----
> From: Souradeep Chakrabarti <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 8:49 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Dexuan Cui
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Long Li <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: Souradeep Chakrabarti <[email protected]>; Paul Rosswurm
> <[email protected]>; Souradeep Chakrabarti
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: mana: Assigning IRQ affinity on HT cores
> 
> Existing MANA design assigns IRQ affinity to every sibling CPUs, which causes
> IRQ coalescing and may reduce the network performance with RSS.
> 
> Improve the performance by adhering the configuration for RSS, which
> prioritise
> IRQ affinity on HT cores.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c   | 126 ++++++++++++++++-
> -
>  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> index 6367de0c2c2e..839be819d46e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> @@ -1243,13 +1243,115 @@ void mana_gd_free_res_map(struct
> gdma_resource *r)
>       r->size = 0;
>  }
> 
> +static void cpu_mask_set(cpumask_var_t *filter_mask, cpumask_var_t
> **filter_mask_list)
> +{
> +     unsigned int core_count = 0, cpu;
> +     cpumask_var_t *filter_mask_list_tmp;
> +
> +     BUG_ON(!filter_mask || !filter_mask_list);
> +     filter_mask_list_tmp = *filter_mask_list;
> +     cpumask_copy(*filter_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +     /* for each core create a cpumask lookup table,
> +      * which stores all the corresponding siblings
> +      */
> +     for_each_cpu(cpu, *filter_mask) {
> +
>       BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&filter_mask_list_tmp[core_count],
> GFP_KERNEL));
> +             cpumask_or(filter_mask_list_tmp[core_count],
> filter_mask_list_tmp[core_count],
> +                        topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> +             cpumask_andnot(*filter_mask, *filter_mask,
> topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> +             core_count++;
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static int irq_setup(int *irqs, int nvec)
> +{
> +     cpumask_var_t filter_mask;
> +     cpumask_var_t *filter_mask_list;
> +     unsigned int cpu_first, cpu, irq_start, cores = 0;
> +     int i, core_count = 0, numa_node, cpu_count = 0, err = 0;
> +
> +     BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&filter_mask, GFP_KERNEL));
> +     cpus_read_lock();
> +     cpumask_copy(filter_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +     /* count the number of cores
> +      */
> +     for_each_cpu(cpu, filter_mask) {
> +             cpumask_andnot(filter_mask, filter_mask,
> topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> +             cores++;
> +     }
> +     filter_mask_list = kcalloc(cores, sizeof(cpumask_var_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!filter_mask_list) {
> +             err = -ENOMEM;
> +             goto free_irq;
> +     }
> +     /* if number of cpus are equal to max_queues per port, then
> +      * one extra interrupt for the hardware channel communication.
> +      */
> +     if (nvec - 1 == num_online_cpus()) {
> +             irq_start = 1;
> +             cpu_first = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> +             irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irqs[0], cpumask_of(cpu_first));
> +     } else {
> +             irq_start = 0;
> +     }
> +     /* reset the core_count and num_node to 0.
> +      */
> +     core_count = 0;
> +     numa_node = 0;

Please start with gc->numa_node here. I know it's 0 for now. But the host 
will provide real numa node# close to the device in the future.

Also, as we discussed, consider using the NUMA distance to select the next
numa node (in a separate patch).

> +     cpu_mask_set(&filter_mask, &filter_mask_list);
> +     /* for each interrupt find the cpu of a particular
> +      * sibling set and if it belongs to the specific numa
> +      * then assign irq to it and clear the cpu bit from
> +      * the corresponding sibling list from filter_mask_list.
> +      * Increase the cpu_count for that node.
> +      * Once all cpus for a numa node is assigned, then
> +      * move to different numa node and continue the same.
> +      */
> +     for (i = irq_start; i < nvec; ) {
> +             cpu_first = cpumask_first(filter_mask_list[core_count]);
> +             if (cpu_first < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_to_node(cpu_first) ==
> numa_node) {
> +                     irq_set_affinity_and_hint(irqs[i],
> cpumask_of(cpu_first));
> +                     cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_first,
> filter_mask_list[core_count]);
> +                     cpu_count = cpu_count + 1;
> +                     i = i + 1;
> +                     /* checking if all the cpus are used from the
> +                      * particular node.
> +                      */
> +                     if (cpu_count == nr_cpus_node(numa_node)) {
> +                             numa_node = numa_node + 1;
> +                             if (numa_node == num_online_nodes()) {
> +                                     cpu_mask_set(&filter_mask,
> &filter_mask_list);
> +                                     numa_node = 0;
Ditto.

Other things look good to me.

Thanks,
- Haiyang


Reply via email to