> It occurred to me overnight that the existing error handling
> in create_gpadl_header() is unnecessarily complicated.  Here's
> an approach that I think would fix what you have flagged, and
> would reduce complexity instead of increasing it.  Thoughts?

I find this development view interesting.


> diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel.c b/drivers/hv/channel.c
> index 56f7e06c673e..44b1d5c8dfed 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/channel.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/channel.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static int create_gpadl_header(enum hv_gpadl_type type, 
> void *kbuffer,
>                         sizeof(struct gpa_range) + pfncount * sizeof(u64);
>               msgheader =  kzalloc(msgsize, GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (!msgheader)
> -                     goto nomem;
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
>
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msgheader->submsglist);
>               msgheader->msgsize = msgsize;
> @@ -386,8 +386,8 @@ static int create_gpadl_header(enum hv_gpadl_type type, 
> void *kbuffer,
>                                       list_del(&pos->msglistentry);
>                                       kfree(pos);
>                               }
> -
> -                             goto nomem;
> +                             kfree(msgheader);
> +                             return -ENOMEM;
>                       }
>
>                       msgbody->msgsize = msgsize;
> @@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ static int create_gpadl_header(enum hv_gpadl_type type, 
> void *kbuffer,
>                         sizeof(struct vmbus_channel_gpadl_header) +
>                         sizeof(struct gpa_range) + pagecount * sizeof(u64);
>               msgheader = kzalloc(msgsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> -             if (msgheader == NULL)
> -                     goto nomem;
> +             if (!msgheader)
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
>
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msgheader->submsglist);
>               msgheader->msgsize = msgsize;
> @@ -437,10 +437,6 @@ static int create_gpadl_header(enum hv_gpadl_type type, 
> void *kbuffer,
>       }
>
>       return 0;
> -nomem:
> -     kfree(msgheader);
> -     kfree(msgbody);
> -     return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>
>  /*
>

Should up to two memory areas still be released after a data processing failure?

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to