Hi Hamza,

Thanks for the patch, a few comments below:

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 03:05:06PM -0500, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> Currently, it is effectively impossible to offline CPUs. Since, most
> CPUs will have vmbus channels attached to them. So, as made mention of
> in commit d570aec0f2154 ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Synchronize
> init_vp_index() vs. CPU hotplug"), rebind channels associated with CPUs
> that a user is trying to offline to a new "randomly" selected CPU.
> 
> Cc: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wei Liu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv.c        | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  include/linux/hyperv.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> index 36d9ba097ff5..42270a7a7a19 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> @@ -433,13 +433,40 @@ static bool hv_synic_event_pending(void)
>       return pending;
>  }
>  
> +static int hv_pick_new_cpu(struct vmbus_channel *channel,
> +                        unsigned int current_cpu)
> +{
> +     int ret = 0;
> +     int cpu;
> +
> +     lockdep_assert_held(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We can't assume that the relevant interrupts will be sent before
> +      * the cpu is offlined on older versions of hyperv.
> +      */
> +     if (vmbus_proto_version < VERSION_WIN10_V5_3)
> +             return -EBUSY;
> +
> +     cpus_read_lock();

hv_pick_new_cpu() is only called inside hv_synic_cleanup(), which is
only called with cpus_read_lock() held (because it's registered via
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked()). So the cpus_read_lock() is not
necessary here if I'm not missing anything. Moreover, given
cpus_read_lock() is a non-recursive read lock, it's actually incorrect
to re-acquire it here, see:

        https://docs.kernel.org/locking/lockdep-design.html#recursive-read-locks

for more information.

> +     cpu = cpumask_next(get_random_u32_below(nr_cpu_ids), cpu_online_mask);
> +
> +     if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || cpu == current_cpu)
> +             cpu = VMBUS_CONNECT_CPU;
> +
> +     ret = vmbus_channel_set_cpu(channel, cpu);
> +     cpus_read_unlock();
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * hv_synic_cleanup - Cleanup routine for hv_synic_init().
>   */
>  int hv_synic_cleanup(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>       struct vmbus_channel *channel, *sc;
> -     bool channel_found = false;
> +     int ret = 0;
>  
>       if (vmbus_connection.conn_state != CONNECTED)
>               goto always_cleanup;
> @@ -456,31 +483,31 @@ int hv_synic_cleanup(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>       /*
>        * Search for channels which are bound to the CPU we're about to
> -      * cleanup.  In case we find one and vmbus is still connected, we
> -      * fail; this will effectively prevent CPU offlining.
> -      *
> -      * TODO: Re-bind the channels to different CPUs.
> +      * cleanup.
>        */
>       mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
>       list_for_each_entry(channel, &vmbus_connection.chn_list, listentry) {
>               if (channel->target_cpu == cpu) {
> -                     channel_found = true;
> -                     break;
> +                     ret = hv_pick_new_cpu(channel, cpu);
> +
> +                     if (ret) {
> +                             mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +                             return ret;
> +                     }
>               }
>               list_for_each_entry(sc, &channel->sc_list, sc_list) {
>                       if (sc->target_cpu == cpu) {
> -                             channel_found = true;
> -                             break;
> +                             ret = hv_pick_new_cpu(channel, cpu);
> +
> +                             if (ret) {
> +                                     
> mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +                                     return ret;
> +                             }
>                       }
>               }
> -             if (channel_found)
> -                     break;
>       }
>       mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
>  
> -     if (channel_found)
> -             return -EBUSY;
> -
>       /*
>        * channel_found == false means that any channels that were previously
>        * assigned to the CPU have been reassigned elsewhere with a call of
> @@ -497,5 +524,5 @@ int hv_synic_cleanup(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>       hv_synic_disable_regs(cpu);
>  
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> index 2892b8da20a5..c256e02fa66b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> @@ -1611,16 +1611,15 @@ static ssize_t target_cpu_show(struct vmbus_channel 
> *channel, char *buf)
>  {
>       return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", channel->target_cpu);
>  }
> -static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel *channel,

It'll be nice if you could separate this change into a different patch,
that is one patch for refactoring target_cpu_store() with
vmbus_channel_set_cpu() and the other patch to introduce the support of
cpu offline. Make it easier for reviewing.

> -                             const char *buf, size_t count)
> +
> +int vmbus_channel_set_cpu(struct vmbus_channel *channel, u32 target_cpu)
>  {
> -     u32 target_cpu, origin_cpu;
> -     ssize_t ret = count;
> +     u32 origin_cpu;
> +     int ret = 0;
>  
> -     if (vmbus_proto_version < VERSION_WIN10_V4_1)
> -             return -EIO;
> +     lockdep_assert_held(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);

Add

        lockdep_assert_cpus_held();

as well?

Regards,
Boqun

>  
> -     if (sscanf(buf, "%uu", &target_cpu) != 1)
> +     if (vmbus_proto_version < VERSION_WIN10_V4_1)
>               return -EIO;
>  
>       /* Validate target_cpu for the cpumask_test_cpu() operation below. */
> @@ -1630,22 +1629,17 @@ static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel 
> *channel,
>       if (!cpumask_test_cpu(target_cpu, 
> housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ)))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     /* No CPUs should come up or down during this. */
> -     cpus_read_lock();
> -
> -     if (!cpu_online(target_cpu)) {
> -             cpus_read_unlock();
> +     if (!cpu_online(target_cpu))
>               return -EINVAL;
> -     }
>  
>       /*
> -      * Synchronizes target_cpu_store() and channel closure:
> +      * Synchronizes vmbus_channel_set_cpu() and channel closure:
>        *
>        * { Initially: state = CHANNEL_OPENED }
>        *
>        * CPU1                         CPU2
>        *
> -      * [target_cpu_store()]         [vmbus_disconnect_ring()]
> +      * [vmbus_channel_set_cpu()]    [vmbus_disconnect_ring()]
>        *
>        * LOCK channel_mutex           LOCK channel_mutex
>        * LOAD r1 = state              LOAD r2 = state
> @@ -1660,7 +1654,6 @@ static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel 
> *channel,
>        * Note.  The host processes the channel messages "sequentially", in
>        * the order in which they are received on a per-partition basis.
>        */
> -     mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
>  
>       /*
>        * Hyper-V will ignore MODIFYCHANNEL messages for "non-open" channels;
> @@ -1668,17 +1661,17 @@ static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel 
> *channel,
>        */
>       if (channel->state != CHANNEL_OPENED_STATE) {
>               ret = -EIO;
> -             goto cpu_store_unlock;
> +             goto end;
>       }
>  
>       origin_cpu = channel->target_cpu;
>       if (target_cpu == origin_cpu)
> -             goto cpu_store_unlock;
> +             goto end;
>  
>       if (vmbus_send_modifychannel(channel,
>                                    hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(target_cpu))) {
>               ret = -EIO;
> -             goto cpu_store_unlock;
> +             goto end;
>       }
>  
>       /*
> @@ -1708,9 +1701,25 @@ static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel 
> *channel,
>                               origin_cpu, target_cpu);
>       }
>  
> -cpu_store_unlock:
> -     mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +end:
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t target_cpu_store(struct vmbus_channel *channel,
> +                             const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +     ssize_t ret = count;
> +     u32 target_cpu;
> +
> +     if (sscanf(buf, "%uu", &target_cpu) != 1)
> +             return -EIO;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +     cpus_read_lock();
> +     ret = vmbus_channel_set_cpu(channel, target_cpu);
>       cpus_read_unlock();
> +     mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
> +
>       return ret;
>  }
>  static VMBUS_CHAN_ATTR(cpu, 0644, target_cpu_show, target_cpu_store);
> diff --git a/include/linux/hyperv.h b/include/linux/hyperv.h
> index 02a226bcf0ed..25e9e982f1b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hyperv.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hyperv.h
> @@ -1670,6 +1670,7 @@ int vmbus_send_tl_connect_request(const guid_t 
> *shv_guest_servie_id,
>                                 const guid_t *shv_host_servie_id);
>  int vmbus_send_modifychannel(struct vmbus_channel *channel, u32 target_vp);
>  void vmbus_set_event(struct vmbus_channel *channel);
> +int vmbus_channel_set_cpu(struct vmbus_channel *channel, u32 target_cpu);
>  
>  /* Get the start of the ring buffer. */
>  static inline void *
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

Reply via email to