On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 9:59 PM Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadh...@amd.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/4/2025 11:35 PM, Tianyu Lan wrote: > > From: Tianyu Lan <ti...@microsoft.com> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c > > index 308c8f279df8..2ff433cb5cc2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c > > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c > > @@ -314,8 +314,11 @@ void hv_synic_enable_regs(unsigned int cpu) > > shared_sint.vector = vmbus_interrupt; > > shared_sint.masked = false; > > shared_sint.auto_eoi = hv_recommend_using_aeoi(); > > + > > Nit: extra newline.
Thanks for your review. Will remove it.. > > > hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64); > > > > + hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, true); > > + > > /* Enable the global synic bit */ > > sctrl.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SCONTROL); > > sctrl.enable = 1; > > @@ -342,7 +345,6 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu) > > union hv_synic_scontrol sctrl; > > > > shared_sint.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT); > > - > > Nit: extra newline. > Will remove it.. > > > shared_sint.masked = 1; > > > > /* Need to correctly cleanup in the case of SMP!!! */ > > @@ -350,6 +352,9 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu) > > hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64); > > > > simp.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SIMP); > > + > > + hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, false); > > + > > Nit: Maybe this should be above "simp.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SIMP)" ? > -- Thanks Tianyu Lan