On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 02:56:17PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Check for an unexpected/unhandled VM-Exit after the manual RETPOLINE=y
> handling.  The entire point of the RETPOLINE checks is to optimize for
> common VM-Exits, i.e. checking for the rare case of an unsupported
> VM-Exit is counter-productive.  This also aligns SVM and VMX exit handling.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 638a67ef0c37..202a4d8088a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3435,12 +3435,6 @@ static void dump_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code)
>  {
> -     if (exit_code >= ARRAY_SIZE(svm_exit_handlers))
> -             goto unexpected_vmexit;
> -
> -     if (!svm_exit_handlers[exit_code])
> -             goto unexpected_vmexit;
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE
>       if (exit_code == SVM_EXIT_MSR)
>               return msr_interception(vcpu);
> @@ -3457,6 +3451,12 @@ int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
> exit_code)
>               return sev_handle_vmgexit(vcpu);
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +     if (exit_code >= ARRAY_SIZE(svm_exit_handlers))
> +             goto unexpected_vmexit;
> +
> +     if (!svm_exit_handlers[exit_code])
> +             goto unexpected_vmexit;
> +
>       return svm_exit_handlers[exit_code](vcpu);
>  
>  unexpected_vmexit:
> -- 
> 2.52.0.rc1.455.g30608eb744-goog
> 

Reply via email to