Jean Delvare wrote: > > I am now convinced your proposed implementation makes sense for your > specific need (which is relatively rare, which is why i2c-core doesn't > handle it.) And contrary to what I first wrote, this doesn't need to be > moved to i2c-core: this is specific enough that I'd rather let the code > live in the bus driver (i2c-ocores) for now, and only if at least two > other bus drivers need the same, consider moving it to i2c-core. > > So if you fix the minor objection Ben had about your patch and resend > it, I think we can merge that.
Will do. > Oh, and I also believe your driver > should call i2c_unregister_device() on removal, for symmetry. Isn't better to leave that to i2c_del_adapter? Otherwise we need to store a list of the I2C-clients returned by i2c_new_device. --Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
