> > Ah, so 'make the driver work on i.MX51' is a good statement which should > > be part of the commit message. > Well, maybe I can mention it. > But I think the good point is to present what you modified, not the side > effect.
It is not the side effect but the intention :) As no code is changed without a need, the reason really should be in the patch description. > Yes. But I don't have multi-master system. So I can't say that. > The code is just taken from Freescale latest code. Without it, It > could also cause a device error. I forget the details. Anyway, it > doesn't make anything wrong. Do you know where the details are explained? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
