-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Shinya Kuribayashi
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 9:53 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" 
pointer

While we have "buf_len" local variable for dev->tx_buf_len, we don't have such 
local variable for dev->tx_buf pointer.  While "buf_len" is restored at first 
then updated when we're going to process a new i2c_msg (in WRITE_IN_PROGRESS 
case), ->tx_buf is never done so.

Such inconsistency makes the code slightly hard to follow.

Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[email protected]>
---

 Furthermore, even with this change, i2c_dw_xfer_msg() is still  inconsistent 
with i2c_dw_read().  I don't have preference around  here, but would like to 
sort out.  Any suggestions are welcome.

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c |    7 ++++---
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c 
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index de006f0..b3152c2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
        int rx_limit = dev->rx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_RXFLR);
        u32 addr = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr;
        u32 buf_len = dev->tx_buf_len;
+       u8 *buf = dev->tx_buf;;
 
        for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev->msg_write_idx++) {
                /* if target address has changed, we need to @@ -381,7 +382,7 
@@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
 
                if (!(dev->status & STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
                        /* new i2c_msg */
-                       dev->tx_buf = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
+                       buf     = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
                        buf_len = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].len;
                }
 
@@ -390,12 +391,12 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
                                writel(0x100, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
                                rx_limit--;
                        } else
-                               writel(*(dev->tx_buf++),
-                                               dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
+                               writel(*buf++, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
                        tx_limit--; buf_len--;
                }
 
                dev->tx_buf_len = buf_len;
+               dev->tx_buf = buf;
 
                /* more bytes to be written? */
                if (buf_len > 0) {
--
1.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the 
body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to