Hi Stephen, On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement > > > > Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c > > tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as > > before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve > > conflicts in linux-next. > > Any word on this?
Haven't you read this: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg07839.html and the 3 following posts? If you did and something is still not clear, please let me know. My understanding is that the action token is in David's hands now. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
