Hello.

Chaithrika U S wrote:

Add cpufreq support for DaVinci I2C driver.
Tested on DA850/OMAP-L138 EVM. For the purpose of testing, the patches
which add cpufreq support [1] for this SoC are needed.

[1]http://linux.davincidsp.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/
2009-September/016118.html

Signed-off-by: Chaithrika U S <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c |   59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
index 5f0888d..0f41da4 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c

[...]

@@ -508,6 +517,39 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_davinci_isr(int this_irq, void 
*dev_id)
        return count ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+static int i2c_davinci_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
+                                    unsigned long val, void *data)
+{
+       struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev;
+
+       dev = container_of(nb, struct davinci_i2c_dev, freq_transition);
+       if (val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE) {
+               wait_for_completion(&dev->xfr_complete);
+               davinci_i2c_reset_ctrl(dev, 0);
+       } else if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) {
+               i2c_davinci_calc_clk_dividers(dev);
+               davinci_i2c_reset_ctrl(dev, 1);
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int i2c_davinci_cpufreq_register(struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+       dev->freq_transition.notifier_call = i2c_davinci_cpufreq_transition;
+
+       return cpufreq_register_notifier(&dev->freq_transition,
+                                        CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
+}
+
+static inline void i2c_davinci_cpufreq_deregister(struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+       cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&dev->freq_transition,
+                                   CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
+}
+#endif
+
 static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_davinci_algo = {
        .master_xfer    = i2c_davinci_xfer,
        .functionality  = i2c_davinci_func,
@@ -547,6 +589,9 @@ static int davinci_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        }
init_completion(&dev->cmd_complete);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+       init_completion(&dev->xfr_complete);
+#endif
        dev->dev = get_device(&pdev->dev);
        dev->irq = irq->start;
        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
@@ -567,6 +612,14 @@ static int davinci_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                goto err_unuse_clocks;
        }
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+       r = i2c_davinci_cpufreq_register(dev);
+       if (r) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register cpufreq\n");
+               goto err_free_irq;
+       }
+#endif

You should instead define this function as just returning 0 in the #else branch above, so that #ifdef here can be avoided...

+
        adap = &dev->adapter;
        i2c_set_adapdata(adap, dev);
        adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
@@ -606,6 +659,10 @@ static int davinci_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
        struct resource *mem;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+       i2c_davinci_cpufreq_deregister(dev);
+#endif
+

  Same comment here. #ifdef's in the function code are frowned upon....

WBR, Sergei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to