> +     {
> +             I2C_BOARD_INFO("eeprom", 0x50),
> +     },

Is the use of 'eeprom' instead of 'at24' intentional?

Regards

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to