On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:27:34PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:09:56 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > - shall this better go via the i2c-tree? > This seems simpler, yes. I don't think subsystem or driver maintainers > need to be bothered with what is really only a cleanup. What about those subsystems where the maintainers applied the patch from the first round (adding the explicit set to NULL where it had been missing)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
