On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:40:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> > 
> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The issue was truly solved by the second patch in this thread:
> > > 
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5436
> > > 
> > > Accidently, the first one was picked up. So, this patch adds the
> > > remaining diff (and an additional newline).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Luotao Fu <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Kevin Wells <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Ben Dooks <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Jean, can you pick this up, so it will be correct in 2.6.34?
> > 
> > i2c-pnx is for an embedded platform -> this is for Ben.
> 
> Would you mind picking it up if he has not done till, let's say, rc6? He did
> not comment to my pointers so far. Other stuff is pending, too (though not
> urgent). Maybe he is away/busy?

Could you check my for-linus/i2c branch on git.fluff.org to see if
that fixes the problem for you, and if there is anything else that
needs fixing.
 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |



-- 
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to