Hi Jean, On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:13 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > The _pch becomes redundant then, i2c-topcliff.c would be enough, but > both are fine with me, as my initial concern is gone. I agree. I will modify to "i2c-topcliff.c".
> There's no Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Signed-off-by from anyone at Intel > in the patch you posted. Must we get Intel's signature ? We have already got the following. Isn't this enough ? > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Though I haven't heard like the requirement, if Intel's signature is mandatory, I will request to Intel. Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
