On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:46:10 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:48:47AM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > Wow, 6 patches :)
> > 
> Just because I switched to git. Makes it much easier to me to handle 
> a sequence of patches. Yes, I know, it probably works with svn as well.
> Just a personal preference ...

Actually, no, SVN would be horrible for this I think. Quilt, OTOH,
would work just fine.

> > (...)
> > This looks good, however I think the code can be cleaned up further by
> > getting rid of maskp. I introduced maskp [1] because the mask could be
> > at two different places on the command line, but now it is no longer
> > needed.
>
> Not sure how, though, since we either need the index to argv[mask] or the 
> pointer, 
> or we would have to read the mask while checking the parameters. The latter
> doesn't look very clean to me.

The latter is actually what I had in mind. But if you don't like the
idea, just leave the code as it is.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to