Clock stretching is not supposed to last long, so asking to be
rescheduled while waiting for the clock line to be released by a slave
makes little sense. Odds are that the clock line will long have been
released when we run again, so we will have lost time and may even
get an SMBus timeout because of this.

So just busy-wait in that case. This also participates in the effort
to make i2c-algo-bit usable in contexts that can't sleep.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-3.3-rc7.orig/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c 2012-03-15 
18:00:02.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.3-rc7/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c      2012-03-15 
22:44:20.713259845 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/i2c-algo-bit.h>
 
@@ -112,7 +111,7 @@ static int sclhi(struct i2c_algo_bit_dat
                                break;
                        return -ETIMEDOUT;
                }
-               cond_resched();
+               cpu_relax();
        }
 #ifdef DEBUG
        if (jiffies != start && i2c_debug >= 3)


-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to