On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:43:56 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Apply a naming pattern like in the rest of the subsystem to a first set > of mux drivers. Those drivers are the low-hanging fruit; we want to pick > them to motivate upcoming drivers to follow the new pattern. The missing > GPIO driver will be converted in a later patch. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> (pca9541) > Cc: Michael Lawnick <[email protected]> > Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile | 4 ++-- > drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca9541.c => i2c-mux-pca9541.c} | 0 > drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca954x.c => i2c-mux-pca954x.c} | 0 > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > rename drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca9541.c => i2c-mux-pca9541.c} (100%) > rename drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca954x.c => i2c-mux-pca954x.c} (100%)
Good idea. Acked-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> (I can pick this in my tree if you want, just let me know.) Now that you made i2c mux non-experimental, I think it would be great to solve the gpio mux case quickly. Renaming drivers, header files and public structures is better done early. I'll give it a try. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
