On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> Shouldn't this be (av8500->irq_base == NO_IRQ) now that we're tranisitioning 
>> to
>> use 0 as NO_IRQ?
>
> No it shouldn't.  We want new drivers to be rejecting on explicitly zero
> IRQ numbers and not using NO_IRQ at all.  We want to get rid of NO_IRQ
> entirely.

Yes of course, it's strange how I can go astray sometimes ..
(!av8500->irq_base) it is.

Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to