>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 6:10 PM
>To: Zhang, Sonic
>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; [email protected]; LKML; uclinux-dist-
>[email protected]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access
>Macro to head file.
>
>Hi ,
>On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhang, Sonic <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Shubhrajyoti Datta [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 5:48 PM
>>>To: Zhang, Sonic
>>>Cc: Ben Dooks; Wolfram Sang; [email protected]; LKML; uclinux-dist-
>>>[email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i2c-bfin-twi: Move blackfin TWI register access
>>>Macro to head file.
>>>
>>>Hi ,
>>>Some minor comments/ doubts.
>>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> From: Sonic Zhang <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>
>>>A small description may be helpful.
>>>Also the $SUBJECT says move the patch looks more like the remove.
>>>Am I missing something.
>>
>> The subject says these definitions are moved to a head file by the other 
>> patch
>for Blackfin architecture.
>
>Got it thanks.
>
>You may want to add a dependency otherwise it might lead to a compilation 
>break?
>

That patch for Blackfin architecture has already been merged into mainline.

Regards,

Sonic

>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sonic


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to