>>>>> "J" == Jayachandran C <[email protected]> writes:
J> From: Ganesan Ramalingam <[email protected]> J> Deprecate 'regstep' property and use the standard 'reg-shift' property J> for register offset shifts. 'regstep' will still be supported as an J> optional property, but will give a warning when used. .. J> struct ocores_i2c_platform_data { J> - u32 regstep; /* distance between registers */ J> - u32 clock_khz; /* input clock in kHz */ J> - u8 num_devices; /* number of devices in the devices list */ J> + u32 reg_shift; /* register offset shift value */ J> + u32 clock_khz; /* input clock in kHz */ J> + u8 num_devices; /* number of devices in the devices list */ J> struct i2c_board_info const *devices; /* devices connected to the bus */ J> }; Why not just keep this change to the dt bindings, instead of risking breaking stuff for platform drivers as well? There's no conceptual reason why reg_shift is any better than regstep. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
