On 07/05/2012 04:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This way you have multiple nodes with the same register
and different names, which is not how it normally works.
Ok.
This would have the advantage that DT describes gpio-to-irq dependencies.
Moreover, nodes that reference gpios can do gpios =<&gpio 71 0>; instead of
gpios =<&gpio3 7 0>;
Is that desired?
The device tree representation should match what is in the data sheet
normally. If they are in a single continuous number range, then we should
probably have a single device node with multiple register ranges
rather than one device node for each 32-bit register. Looking at
arch/arm/plat-orion/gpio.c I think that is not actually the case though
and having separate banks is more logical.
Well, looking at the datasheet of Dove GPIOs are numbered [63:0] plus
GPOs [71:64]. This dt will be a lot shorter and maybe it is describing
the hardware as it is. (Not sure about the syntax for irqs, though)
gpio@d0400 {
compatible = "marvell,orion-gpio";
gpio-controller;
reg = <0xd0400 0x20>, /* GPIO[31: 0] */
<0xd0420 0x20>, /* GPIO[63:32] */
<0xe8400 0x0c>; /* GPO [71:64] */
ngpio = <72>;
interrupts = <12 13 14 15>, <61>;
};
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
