On 11/16/2012 5:07 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Looks good to me, like the extensive patch descriptions. I am going to > apply it to for-next with patches 2+3 squashed, because after patch 2 we > would have a buggy state otherwise. Let me know if you are not okay with > that.
It's not that buggy as you/we think, in most cases it work without problem. What's more important for me is to record the issue and how to solve it. So I'd like to have patch 2 and 3 separately. Thank you for your offer anyway, -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
