On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:30:57 -0500 (EST), David Miller <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:49:26 +0000
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> From: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:44:57 +0000
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> This series removes the dependency on !SPARC for OF_I2C and removes the
> >>>> depencency of !defined(CONFIG_SPARC) for the function
> >>>> of_register_spi_devices. I find no reason for these to be unavailable
> >>>> for sparc.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am not sure if these should go through the sparc tree or the
> >>>> corresponding subsystem trees.
> >>>
> >>> They should go through the subsystem trees.
> >>
> >> I'll take this into the sparc tree after some build testing, thanks.
> > 
> > I'd prefer to take the SPI one through my tree, but I won't get my
> > knickers in a knot if you insist.
> 
> That's fine:
> 
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

g.


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to