2013/1/23 Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:51:12PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
>> 2013/1/23 Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>:
>> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:32:44PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
>> >> This patch adds at24c512b i2c device to the device tree
>> >> along with the necessary i2c device node and pinctrl
>> >> settings for i2c bus.
>> >> The eeprom chip is populated on the accessory board of
>> >> the imx51-babbage board.
>> >
>> > Given that it's optional should the binding be here anyway? I don't have
>> > this accessory board and this may conflict with the boards other people
>> > have connected on this port.
>> >
>> > Sascha
>>
>> Understand your concern. Is there any way to handle this? How can we support
>> the present accessory board correctly? More generally, not all main boards 
>> can
>> figure out what kind of accessory board is attached to them, at least, some 
>> main
>> boards can only figure out limited number of accessory boards by using some 
>> ways
>> of board ID check.
>
> We don't have support for such things atm. We'll have to wait for
>
> OF: Introduce DT overlay support.
>
> Pantelis Antoniou is working on this currently.
>
> Sascha
>
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Good to know that. Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Liu Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to