> Thanks, yes, we could try usleep_range(), but these delays could be a bit > sensitive, so, such a change would require a new round of testing. Maybe > we could commit these patches in this form and then I could try > usleep_range() as a separate patch to also make any regression tracking > easier?
Sure. So, series applied to for-next, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
