On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Andreas Werner wrote:
> Revision 2:
>       - delete the pch_err completly instead of changing to pch_dbg
>         because there is already a pch_dbg at the function who calls
>         pch_i2c_getack.
>       - Fixed message line issue

I prefer this below "---" after Signed-off.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> index 0f37529..5c39f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> @@ -321,10 +321,8 @@ static s32 pch_i2c_getack(struct i2c_algo_pch_data *adap)
>       void __iomem *p = adap->pch_base_address;
>       reg_val = ioread32(p + PCH_I2CSR) & PCH_GETACK;
>  
> -     if (reg_val != 0) {
> -             pch_err(adap, "return%d\n", -EPROTO);
> +     if (reg_val != 0)
>               return -EPROTO;

That could be fixed to -ENXIO according to
Documentation/i2c/fault-codes.

> @@ -367,8 +365,7 @@ static int pch_i2c_wait_for_check_xfer(struct 
> i2c_algo_pch_data *adap)
>       adap->pch_event_flag = 0;
>  
>       if (pch_i2c_getack(adap)) {
> -             pch_dbg(adap, "Receive NACK for slave address"
> -                     "setting\n");
> +             pch_dbg(adap, "Receive NACK for slave address setting\n");
>               return -EIO;

What about returning the value we got from pch_i2c_getack?

Regards,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to