smatch rightfully says: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c:610 i2c_imx_probe() info: why not propagate 'irq' from platform_get_irq() instead of (-2)?
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index d0cfbb4..db895fb 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (irq < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get irq number\n"); - return -ENOENT; + return irq; } res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); -- 1.8.4.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
