>    After looking at the code, it looks like it was a false alarm on my side.
> The I2C interrupts are disabled here and other threads should be locked out
> by the I2C core locks. So it doesn't make sense to hold IRQs disabled during
> a possibly long polling loop in rcar_i2c_bus_barrier(). So I'll just repost
> the revert patch (if still needed).

Nope. Thanks for looking into it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to