Hi Guenter, > On Jan 14, 2015, at 16:14 , Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/14/2015 05:54 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>> That being said, nobody complained about this in 11 years, so I would >>> be surprised if it was plain wrong. I'd rather question the test code. >>> Where is it? >>> >> >> No-one has apparently tested removing an i2c mux device on a running system >> before. >> > Hi Pantelis, > > We didn't see the problem with 3.14. That was with an earlier version of the > overlay patchset, though. >
There have been changes to the overlay patchset since then true, but I don’t see how that would trigger a deadlock in i2c. The completion wait just seems bogus to me. > Guenter > Regards — Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
