(CC'ing Dmitry) On Monday 02 March 2015 07:40:49 Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>>>> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it > >>>>> encounters it in a .dts. > >>>> > >>>> Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it > >>>> is not different from 345 (which is fine by me). > >>> > >>> To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be > >>> omitted from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching. > >> > >> Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like > >> i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live > >> with it :) > > > > What happened to this patch ? > > My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763
I'm fine with that. Dmitry ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
