> > Your patch descriptions need improvement. They describe what you do, but
> > this can be seen in the patch as well. What you need to describe is WHY you
> > need this change.
> 
> In case  the slave nacks the transaction in the middle of the transfer The 
> driver continues.
> 
> > What was wrong before,
> 
> The usual expectation is that in case of error / nack the transaction is 
> halted.

Yeah, this is going into the right direction. Please note, that I meant
that all 9 patch descriptions need rework. I know this is extra work,
but really needed to keep drivers maintainable. Please resend the series
when you are done.

> > Because this driver is long in use, we must be very careful about 
> > regressions
> > and every change needs a good reason.
> 
> I agree.

Great! :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to