On 12/27/2015 9:13 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:

    Well, looking again, the patch should be good. I just thought its goal was
to fix the code as well...

I could do that for the irq < 0 case, but I think that in that case, kbuild
will only run the patch version, and the <= cases will not be reported on.
I don't have a general fix for the <= 0.  Is it even correct to have < in
some cases and <= in others?

   That's a good question...
In my prior fixes of this case I preferred to consider IRQ0 valid and so used 'irq < 0'. I myself don't share the "IRQ0 is invalid" sentiment...

julia

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to