On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:22:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Akshay Bhat <akshay.b...@timesys.com> > >> wrote: > >> > "at" is not a valid vendor prefix, correcting the same to "atmel" > >> > > >> > >> I'm afraid you can't just do this change alone as it's used in some > >> DTS. Though you may deprecated it along with update of current users. > > > > Well, in Linux, I2C core currently strips the vendor anyhow. This will > > probably be changed somewhen (tm), but for now, the impact for Linux > > should be extremly close to 0. > > Okay, no objections to the original patch then.
Heh, I just go reminded that eeproms already have a seperate binding description (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt). I will update the eeprom bindings and remove the entries from trivial devices.
Description: Digital signature